summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohn McCall <rjmccall@apple.com>2014-12-14 01:46:53 +0000
committerJohn McCall <rjmccall@apple.com>2014-12-14 01:46:53 +0000
commitba912273288ce8963808816565faf7cad6a09b69 (patch)
tree14df3a0607b69963fc929c2afa041673157fb291
parent81fcac72061abd5a6e16184394357bf18f2321e3 (diff)
If a non-template constructor instantiated to X(X),
ignore it during overload resolution when initializing X from a value of type cv X. Previously, our rule here only ignored specializations of constructor templates. That's probably because the standard says that constructors are outright ill-formed if their first parameter is literally X and they're callable with one argument. However, Clang only enforces that prohibition against non-implicit instantiations; I'm not sure why, but it seems to be deliberate. Given that, the most sensible thing to do is to just ignore the "illegal" constructor regardless of where it came from. Also, stop ignoring such constructors silently: print a note explaining why they're being ignored. Fixes <rdar://19199836>. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@224205 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td3
-rw-r--r--include/clang/Sema/Overload.h11
-rw-r--r--lib/AST/DeclCXX.cpp1
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp30
-rw-r--r--test/SemaTemplate/constructor-template.cpp50
5 files changed, 83 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td b/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
index 48fdf6f826..32bf1b067b 100644
--- a/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ b/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -2847,6 +2847,9 @@ def note_ovl_candidate : Note<"candidate "
"|volatile and restrict|const, volatile, and restrict}4)}2">;
def note_ovl_candidate_inherited_constructor : Note<"inherited from here">;
+def note_ovl_candidate_illegal_constructor : Note<
+ "candidate %select{constructor|template}0 ignored: "
+ "instantiation %select{takes|would take}0 its own class type by value">;
def note_ovl_candidate_bad_deduction : Note<
"candidate template ignored: failed template argument deduction">;
def note_ovl_candidate_incomplete_deduction : Note<"candidate template ignored: "
diff --git a/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h b/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h
index 41dcf974e5..4447db2b3e 100644
--- a/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h
+++ b/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h
@@ -553,6 +553,17 @@ namespace clang {
/// conversion.
ovl_fail_trivial_conversion,
+ /// This conversion candidate was not considered because it is
+ /// an illegal instantiation of a constructor temploid: it is
+ /// callable with one argument, we only have one argument, and
+ /// its first parameter type is exactly the type of the class.
+ ///
+ /// Defining such a constructor directly is illegal, and
+ /// template-argument deduction is supposed to ignore such
+ /// instantiations, but we can still get one with the right
+ /// kind of implicit instantiation.
+ ovl_fail_illegal_constructor,
+
/// This conversion candidate is not viable because its result
/// type is not implicitly convertible to the desired type.
ovl_fail_bad_final_conversion,
diff --git a/lib/AST/DeclCXX.cpp b/lib/AST/DeclCXX.cpp
index 0ee3e3e904..a6d9d411ee 100644
--- a/lib/AST/DeclCXX.cpp
+++ b/lib/AST/DeclCXX.cpp
@@ -1831,7 +1831,6 @@ bool CXXConstructorDecl::isConvertingConstructor(bool AllowExplicit) const {
bool CXXConstructorDecl::isSpecializationCopyingObject() const {
if ((getNumParams() < 1) ||
(getNumParams() > 1 && !getParamDecl(1)->hasDefaultArg()) ||
- (getPrimaryTemplate() == nullptr) ||
(getDescribedFunctionTemplate() != nullptr))
return false;
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
index d33f126db1..9058fc098d 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -5586,6 +5586,15 @@ Sema::AddOverloadCandidate(FunctionDecl *Function,
// Overload resolution is always an unevaluated context.
EnterExpressionEvaluationContext Unevaluated(*this, Sema::Unevaluated);
+ // Add this candidate
+ OverloadCandidate &Candidate = CandidateSet.addCandidate(Args.size());
+ Candidate.FoundDecl = FoundDecl;
+ Candidate.Function = Function;
+ Candidate.Viable = true;
+ Candidate.IsSurrogate = false;
+ Candidate.IgnoreObjectArgument = false;
+ Candidate.ExplicitCallArguments = Args.size();
+
if (Constructor) {
// C++ [class.copy]p3:
// A member function template is never instantiated to perform the copy
@@ -5594,19 +5603,13 @@ Sema::AddOverloadCandidate(FunctionDecl *Function,
if (Args.size() == 1 &&
Constructor->isSpecializationCopyingObject() &&
(Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(ClassType, Args[0]->getType()) ||
- IsDerivedFrom(Args[0]->getType(), ClassType)))
+ IsDerivedFrom(Args[0]->getType(), ClassType))) {
+ Candidate.Viable = false;
+ Candidate.FailureKind = ovl_fail_illegal_constructor;
return;
+ }
}
- // Add this candidate
- OverloadCandidate &Candidate = CandidateSet.addCandidate(Args.size());
- Candidate.FoundDecl = FoundDecl;
- Candidate.Function = Function;
- Candidate.Viable = true;
- Candidate.IsSurrogate = false;
- Candidate.IgnoreObjectArgument = false;
- Candidate.ExplicitCallArguments = Args.size();
-
unsigned NumParams = Proto->getNumParams();
// (C++ 13.3.2p2): A candidate function having fewer than m
@@ -9235,6 +9238,13 @@ static void NoteFunctionCandidate(Sema &S, OverloadCandidate *Cand,
case ovl_fail_bad_deduction:
return DiagnoseBadDeduction(S, Cand, NumArgs);
+ case ovl_fail_illegal_constructor: {
+ S.Diag(Fn->getLocation(), diag::note_ovl_candidate_illegal_constructor)
+ << (Fn->getPrimaryTemplate() ? 1 : 0);
+ MaybeEmitInheritedConstructorNote(S, Fn);
+ return;
+ }
+
case ovl_fail_trivial_conversion:
case ovl_fail_bad_final_conversion:
case ovl_fail_final_conversion_not_exact:
diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/constructor-template.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/constructor-template.cpp
index cf3fdfb7c1..c5306a6e32 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/constructor-template.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/constructor-template.cpp
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct B { A<int> x; B(B& a) : x(a.x) {} };
struct X2 {
X2(); // expected-note{{candidate constructor}}
X2(X2&); // expected-note {{candidate constructor}}
- template<typename T> X2(T);
+ template<typename T> X2(T); // expected-note {{candidate template ignored: instantiation would take its own class type by value}}
};
X2 test(bool Cond, X2 x2) {
@@ -126,3 +126,51 @@ namespace PR8182 {
}
}
+
+// Don't blow out the stack trying to call an illegal constructor
+// instantiation. We intentionally allow implicit instantiations to
+// exist, so make sure they're unusable.
+//
+// rdar://19199836
+namespace self_by_value {
+ template <class T, class U> struct A {
+ A() {}
+ A(const A<T,U> &o) {}
+ A(A<T,T> o) {}
+ };
+
+ void helper(A<int,float>);
+
+ void test1(A<int,int> a) {
+ helper(a);
+ }
+ void test2() {
+ helper(A<int,int>());
+ }
+}
+
+namespace self_by_value_2 {
+ template <class T, class U> struct A {
+ A() {} // expected-note {{not viable: requires 0 arguments}}
+ A(A<T,U> &o) {} // expected-note {{not viable: expects an l-value}}
+ A(A<T,T> o) {} // expected-note {{ignored: instantiation takes its own class type by value}}
+ };
+
+ void helper_A(A<int,int>); // expected-note {{passing argument to parameter here}}
+ void test_A() {
+ helper_A(A<int,int>()); // expected-error {{no matching constructor}}
+ }
+}
+
+namespace self_by_value_3 {
+ template <class T, class U> struct A {
+ A() {}
+ A(A<T,U> &o) {}
+ A(A<T,T> o) {}
+ };
+
+ void helper_A(A<int,int>);
+ void test_A(A<int,int> b) {
+ helper_A(b);
+ }
+}