Function with unparsed body is a definition

While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered
as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to
incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785:
```
    template<typename T> struct Somewhat {
      void internal() const {}
      friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {}
    };
void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); }
```
When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type
of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It
instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for
redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration
of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet.

To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers
a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set.

This change fixes PR14785.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375

This is a recommit of 305379, reverted in 305381, with small changes.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@305903 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
index 844299bb87..0b46e15bb0 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -13878,6 +13878,9 @@ void Sema::SetDeclDeleted(Decl *Dcl, SourceLocation DelLoc) {
     return;
   }
 
+  // Deleted function does not have a body.
+  Fn->setWillHaveBody(false);
+
   if (const FunctionDecl *Prev = Fn->getPreviousDecl()) {
     // Don't consider the implicit declaration we generate for explicit
     // specializations. FIXME: Do not generate these implicit declarations.