summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRichard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>2017-10-09 23:42:09 +0000
committerRichard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>2017-10-09 23:42:09 +0000
commit9ee4a4e444f01064a5771f7d6b8839c6b175fbbe (patch)
treeabb9aa11dd6bf633bc2226c26cf70b02af3291b8 /lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp
parenta167502bf9cf5f494c8e5ebcf28be822809b013f (diff)
[Modules TS] Module ownership semantics for redeclarations.
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module ("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@315251 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp30
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp
index a89d3ace24..6fb0260075 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp
@@ -1609,11 +1609,39 @@ bool Sema::isVisibleSlow(const NamedDecl *D) {
}
bool Sema::shouldLinkPossiblyHiddenDecl(LookupResult &R, const NamedDecl *New) {
+ // FIXME: If there are both visible and hidden declarations, we need to take
+ // into account whether redeclaration is possible. Example:
+ //
+ // Non-imported module:
+ // int f(T); // #1
+ // Some TU:
+ // static int f(U); // #2, not a redeclaration of #1
+ // int f(T); // #3, finds both, should link with #1 if T != U, but
+ // // with #2 if T == U; neither should be ambiguous.
for (auto *D : R) {
if (isVisible(D))
return true;
+ assert(D->isExternallyDeclarable() &&
+ "should not have hidden, non-externally-declarable result here");
}
- return New->isExternallyVisible();
+
+ // This function is called once "New" is essentially complete, but before a
+ // previous declaration is attached. We can't query the linkage of "New" in
+ // general, because attaching the previous declaration can change the
+ // linkage of New to match the previous declaration.
+ //
+ // However, because we've just determined that there is no *visible* prior
+ // declaration, we can compute the linkage here. There are two possibilities:
+ //
+ // * This is not a redeclaration; it's safe to compute the linkage now.
+ //
+ // * This is a redeclaration of a prior declaration that is externally
+ // redeclarable. In that case, the linkage of the declaration is not
+ // changed by attaching the prior declaration, because both are externally
+ // declarable (and thus ExternalLinkage or VisibleNoLinkage).
+ //
+ // FIXME: This is subtle and fragile.
+ return New->isExternallyDeclarable();
}
/// \brief Retrieve the visible declaration corresponding to D, if any.