diff options
author | Francois Pichet <pichet2000@gmail.com> | 2012-04-17 12:35:05 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Francois Pichet <pichet2000@gmail.com> | 2012-04-17 12:35:05 +0000 |
commit | b2d899e9ae8a48c4057a48664213948934b877fa (patch) | |
tree | 3cece7cae22cb1c166c865d0c3ff9bb0c3f50b82 /lib | |
parent | 0407a04049016bdd6fe4fda462aa199d82c750d4 (diff) |
Emulate a MSVC bug where the creation of pointer-to-member to protected member of base class is allowed but only from a static function.
This fixes a regression when parsing MFC code with clang.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@154924 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Sema/SemaAccess.cpp | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaAccess.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaAccess.cpp index dea5e76d9e..024838d4d4 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaAccess.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaAccess.cpp @@ -779,6 +779,13 @@ static AccessResult HasAccess(Sema &S, // that the naming class has to be derived from the effective // context. + // Emulate a MSVC bug where the creation of pointer-to-member + // to protected member of base class is allowed but only from + // a static function. + if (S.getLangOpts().MicrosoftMode && !EC.Functions.empty() && + EC.Functions.front()->getStorageClass() == SC_Static) + return AR_accessible; + // Despite the standard's confident wording, there is a case // where you can have an instance member that's neither in a // pointer-to-member expression nor in a member access: when |