When creating an implicit member expression through a qualified-id, check that the class

named by the nested-name-specifier is same or base of the class in which the member expression appears.

It seems we also had an ill-formed test case, mon dieu! Fixes rdar://8576107.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@129493 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/test/CXX/class/class.mfct/class.mfct.non-static/p3.cpp b/test/CXX/class/class.mfct/class.mfct.non-static/p3.cpp
index c81e4ef1b1..9116e7146f 100644
--- a/test/CXX/class/class.mfct/class.mfct.non-static/p3.cpp
+++ b/test/CXX/class/class.mfct/class.mfct.non-static/p3.cpp
@@ -35,17 +35,22 @@ namespace test1 {
   struct A {
     void foo(Opaque1); // expected-note {{candidate}}
     void foo(Opaque2); // expected-note {{candidate}}
-    void test();
   };
 
   struct B : A {
-    
+    void test();
   };
 
-  void A::test() {
-    B::foo(Opaque1());
-    B::foo(Opaque2());
-    B::foo(Opaque3()); // expected-error {{no matching member function}}
+  struct C1 : A { };
+  struct C2 : B { };
+
+  void B::test() {
+    A::foo(Opaque1());
+    A::foo(Opaque2());
+    A::foo(Opaque3()); // expected-error {{no matching member function}}
+
+    C1::foo(Opaque1()); // expected-error {{call to non-static member function without an object argument}}
+    C2::foo(Opaque1()); // expected-error {{call to non-static member function without an object argument}}
   }
 }