diff options
| author | David Majnemer <david.majnemer@gmail.com> | 2015-07-02 09:43:11 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Majnemer <david.majnemer@gmail.com> | 2015-07-02 09:43:11 +0000 |
| commit | 23cdc98a29c9503ddc302e127d87d2994b1ca693 (patch) | |
| tree | c5b286083632e8369f1d46dbc4eea6fa208bb1e6 /test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-templates-memptrs.cpp | |
| parent | 5b583cb287118712141180b68df545a04ba6e651 (diff) | |
[MS ABI] nullptr data member ptrs are mangled differently for classes vs fns
It turns out that nullptr pointers to data members act differently in
function templates vs class templates. Class templates use a variable
width representation proportional to the number of fields needed to
materialize it. Function templates always use a single '0' template
parameter. However, using '0' all the time is problematic if the class
uses single or multiple inheritance. In those cases, use -1.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@241251 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-templates-memptrs.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-templates-memptrs.cpp | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-templates-memptrs.cpp b/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-templates-memptrs.cpp index 42237f5b7d..e710abe97e 100644 --- a/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-templates-memptrs.cpp +++ b/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-templates-memptrs.cpp @@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ void ReadFields() { // them right in class templates. // CHECK: call {{.*}} @"\01??$ReadField@US@@$0A@@@YAHAAUS@@@Z" // CHECK: call {{.*}} @"\01??$ReadField@UM@@$0A@@@YAHAAUM@@@Z" -// CHECK: call {{.*}} @"\01??$ReadField@UV@@$FA@?0@@YAHAAUV@@@Z" -// CHECK: call {{.*}} @"\01??$ReadField@UU@@$GA@A@?0@@YAHAAUU@@@Z" +// CHECK: call {{.*}} @"\01??$ReadField@UV@@$0A@@@YAHAAUV@@@Z" +// CHECK: call {{.*}} @"\01??$ReadField@UU@@$0A@@@YAHAAUU@@@Z" // Non-polymorphic null data memptr vs first field memptr. MSVC mangles these // the same. |