clang-format: [Java] Don't let annotations confuse return type analysis.

Before:
  @Test
  ReturnType
  doSomething(String aaaaaaaaaaaaa, String bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb) {}

After:
  @Test
  ReturnType doSomething(
      String aaaaaaaaaaaaa, String bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb) {}

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@225964 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/unittests/Format/FormatTestJava.cpp b/unittests/Format/FormatTestJava.cpp
index 39abc7b555..e0f2b51f06 100644
--- a/unittests/Format/FormatTestJava.cpp
+++ b/unittests/Format/FormatTestJava.cpp
@@ -283,6 +283,10 @@ TEST_F(FormatTestJava, Annotations) {
                "    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)\n"
                "int i;",
                getStyleWithColumns(50));
+  verifyFormat("@Test\n"
+               "ReturnType doSomething(\n"
+               "    String aaaaaaaaaaaaa, String bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb) {}",
+               getStyleWithColumns(60));
 }
 
 TEST_F(FormatTestJava, Generics) {