be more clear about what we are comparing.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@44795 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/www/comparison.html b/www/comparison.html
index aa11b5fa2e..dc9f70d51c 100644
--- a/www/comparison.html
+++ b/www/comparison.html
@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
     <p>Building an entirely new compiler front-end is a big task, and it isn't

        always clear to people why we decided to do this.  Here we compare clang

        and its goals to other open source compiler front-ends that are

-       available.  We restrict the discussion to very specific technical points

-       to avoid controversy where possible.  Also, since software is infinitely

-       mutable, so focus on architectural issues that are impractical to fix

-       without a major rewrite, instead of talking about little details that

-       can be fixed with a reasonable amount of effort.</p>

+       available.  We restrict the discussion to very specific objective points

+       to avoid controversy where possible.  Also, software is infinitely

+       mutable, so we don't talk about little details that can be fixed with 

+       a reasonable amount of effort: we'll talk about issues that are 

+       difficult to fix for architectural or political reasons.</p>

        

     <p>The goal of this list is to describe how differences in goals lead to

        different strengths and weaknesses, not to make some compiler look bad.