From 356afa52f21b78ffc20be92e76dbd382a363d13e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 01:42:13 +0000
Subject: C/ObjC work well enough with clang for them not to be a gcc strength
 anymore.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@70528 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
 www/comparison.html | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'www/comparison.html')

diff --git a/www/comparison.html b/www/comparison.html
index f29c2676d5..0bfff12720 100644
--- a/www/comparison.html
+++ b/www/comparison.html
@@ -50,9 +50,9 @@
     <ul>
     <li>GCC supports languages that clang does not aim to, such as Java, Ada,
         FORTRAN, etc.</li>
-    <li>GCC front-ends are very mature and already support C/C++/ObjC and all
-        the variants we are interested in.  <a href="cxx_status.html">clang's 
-        support for C++</a> in particular is nowhere near what GCC supports.</li>
+    <li>GCC front-ends are very mature and already support C++.
+        <a href="cxx_status.html">clang's support for C++</a> is nowhere near 
+        what GCC supports.</li>
     <li>GCC supports more targets than LLVM.</li>
     <li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li>
     <li>GCC does not require a C++ compiler to build it.</li>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3