// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s // New exciting ambiguities in C++11 // final 'context sensitive' mess. namespace final { struct S { int n; }; struct T { int n; }; namespace N { int n; // These declare variables named final.. extern struct S final; extern struct S final [[]]; extern struct S final, foo; struct S final = S(); // This defines a class, not a variable, even though it would successfully // parse as a variable but not as a class. DR1318's wording suggests that // this disambiguation is only performed on an ambiguity, but that was not // the intent. struct S final { // expected-note {{here}} int(n) // expected-error {{expected ';'}} }; // This too. struct T final : S {}; // expected-error {{base 'S' is marked 'final'}} struct T bar : S {}; // expected-error {{expected ';' after top level declarator}} expected-error {{expected unqualified-id}} } // _Alignas isn't allowed in the places where alignas is. We used to // assert on this. struct U final _Alignas(4) {}; // expected-error 3{{}} expected-note {{}} } // enum versus bitfield mess. namespace bitfield { enum E {}; struct T { constexpr T() {} constexpr T(int) {} constexpr T(T, T, T, T) {} constexpr T operator=(T) const { return *this; } constexpr operator int() const { return 4; } }; constexpr T a, b, c, d; struct S1 { enum E : T ( a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, 4 ); // ok, declares a bitfield }; // This could be a bit-field. struct S2 { enum E : T { a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, 4 }; // expected-error {{non-integral type}} expected-error {{expected identifier}} }; struct S3 { enum E : int { a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, d }; // ok, defines an enum }; // Ambiguous. struct S4 { enum E : int { a = 1 }; // ok, defines an enum }; // This could be a bit-field, but would be ill-formed due to the anonymous // member being initialized. struct S5 { enum E : int { a = 1 } { b = 2 }; // expected-error {{expected ';' after enum}} expected-error {{expected member name}} }; // This could be a bit-field. struct S6 { enum E : int { 1 }; // expected-error {{expected identifier}} }; struct U { constexpr operator T() const { return T(); } // expected-note 2{{candidate}} }; // This could be a bit-field. struct S7 { enum E : int { a = U() }; // expected-error {{no viable conversion}} }; // This could be a bit-field, and does not conform to the grammar of an // enum definition, because 'id(U())' is not a constant-expression. constexpr const U &id(const U &u) { return u; } struct S8 { enum E : int { a = id(U()) }; // expected-error {{no viable conversion}} }; } namespace trailing_return { typedef int n; int a; struct S { S(int); S *operator()(...) const; int n; }; namespace N { void f() { // This parses as a function declaration, but DR1223 makes the presence of // 'auto' be used for disambiguation. S(a)()->n; // ok, expression; expected-warning{{expression result unused}} S(a)(int())->n; // ok, expression; expected-warning{{expression result unused}} auto(a)()->n; // ok, function declaration auto(b)(int())->n; // ok, function declaration using T = decltype(a); using T = auto() -> n; } } } namespace ellipsis { template struct S { void e(S::S()); // expected-error {{is a constructor name}} void f(S(...args[sizeof(T)])); // expected-note {{here}} expected-note {{here}} void f(S(...args)[sizeof(T)]); // expected-error {{redeclared}} void f(S ...args[sizeof(T)]); // expected-error {{redeclared}} void g(S(...[sizeof(T)])); // expected-note {{here}} expected-warning {{ISO C++11 requires a parenthesized pack declaration to have a name}} void g(S(...)[sizeof(T)]); // expected-error {{function cannot return array type}} void g(S ...[sizeof(T)]); // expected-error {{redeclared}} void h(T(...)); // function type, expected-error {{unexpanded parameter pack}} void h(T...); // pack expansion, ok void i(int(T...)); // expected-note {{here}} void i(int(T...a)); // expected-error {{redeclared}} void i(int(T, ...)); // function type, expected-error {{unexpanded parameter pack}} void i(int(T, ...a)); // expected-error {{expected ')'}} expected-note {{to match}} expected-error {{unexpanded parameter pack}} void j(int(int...)); // function type, ok void j(int(int...a)); // expected-error {{does not contain any unexpanded parameter packs}} void j(T(int...)); // expected-error {{unexpanded parameter pack}} void j(T(T...)); // expected-error {{unexpanded parameter pack}} void k(int(...)(T)); // expected-error {{cannot return function type}} void k(int ...(T)); void l(int(&...)(T)); // expected-warning {{ISO C++11 requires a parenthesized pack declaration to have a name}} void l(int(*...)(T)); // expected-warning {{ISO C++11 requires a parenthesized pack declaration to have a name}} void l(int(S::*...)(T)); // expected-warning {{ISO C++11 requires a parenthesized pack declaration to have a name}} }; struct CtorSink { template constexpr CtorSink(T &&...t) { } constexpr operator int() const { return 42; } }; template struct UnsignedTmplArgSink; template void foo(int x, T ...t) { // Have a variety of cases where the syntax is technically unambiguous, but hinges on careful treatment of ellipses. CtorSink(t ...), x; // ok, expression; expected-warning 2{{expression result unused}} int x0(CtorSink(t ...)); // ok, declares object x0 int *p0 = &x0; (void)p0; CtorSink x1(int(t) ..., int(x)); // ok, declares object x1 CtorSink *p1 = &x1; (void)p1; UnsignedTmplArgSink *t0; // ok UnsignedTmplArgSink<((T *)0, 42u) ...> **t0p = &t0; } template void foo(int, int, int); // expected-note {{in instantiation of function template specialization 'ellipsis::foo' requested here}} } namespace braced_init_list { struct X { void foo() {} }; void (*pf1)() {}; void (X::*pmf1)() {&X::foo}; void (X::*pmf2)() = {&X::foo}; void test() { void (*pf2)() {}; void (X::*pmf3)() {&X::foo}; void (X::*pmf4)() = {&X::foo}; } }