// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -verify %s // Check that we deal with cases where the instantiation of a class template // recursively requires the instantiation of the same template. namespace test1 { template struct A { struct B { // expected-note {{not complete until the closing '}'}} B b; // expected-error {{has incomplete type 'test1::A::B'}} }; B b; // expected-note {{in instantiation of}} }; A a; // expected-note {{in instantiation of}} } namespace test2 { template struct A { struct B { struct C {}; char c[1 + C()]; // expected-error {{invalid operands to binary expression}} friend constexpr int operator+(int, C) { return 4; } }; B b; // expected-note {{in instantiation of}} }; A a; // expected-note {{in instantiation of}} } namespace test3 { // PR12317 template struct A { struct B { enum { Val = 1 }; char c[1 + Val]; // ok }; B b; }; A a; } namespace test4 { template struct M { typedef int type; }; template struct A { struct B { // expected-note {{not complete until the closing '}'}} int k[typename A::type>::B().k[0] + 1]; // expected-error {{incomplete type}} }; B b; // expected-note {{in instantiation of}} }; A a; // expected-note {{in instantiation of}} } // FIXME: PR12298: Recursive constexpr function template instantiation leads to // stack overflow. #if 0 namespace test5 { template struct A { constexpr T f(T k) { return g(k); } constexpr T g(T k) { return k ? f(k-1)+1 : 0; } }; // This should be accepted. constexpr int x = A().f(5); } namespace test6 { template constexpr T f(T); template constexpr T g(T t) { typedef int arr[f(T())]; return t; } template constexpr T f(T t) { typedef int arr[g(T())]; return t; } // This should be ill-formed. int n = f(0); } namespace test7 { template constexpr T g(T t) { return t; } template constexpr T f(T t) { typedef int arr[g(T())]; return t; } // This should be accepted. int n = f(0); } #endif