blob: 2bfe591a50bcdc6bc5640519c6fae753489ba3e5 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
|
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++11 -analyzer-checker=alpha.clone.CloneChecker -analyzer-config alpha.clone.CloneChecker:MinimumCloneComplexity=10 -verify %s
// This tests if we search for clones in functions.
void log();
int max(int a, int b) { // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}}
log();
if (a > b)
return a;
return b;
}
int maxClone(int x, int y) { // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
log();
if (x > y)
return x;
return y;
}
// Functions below are not clones and should not be reported.
// The next two functions test that statement classes are still respected when
// checking for clones in expressions. This will show that the statement
// specific data of all base classes is collected, and not just the data of the
// first base class.
int testBaseClass(int a, int b) { // no-warning
log();
if (a > b)
return true ? a : b;
return b;
}
int testBaseClass2(int a, int b) { // no-warning
log();
if (a > b)
return __builtin_choose_expr(true, a, b);
return b;
}
// No clone because of the different comparison operator.
int min1(int a, int b) { // no-warning
log();
if (a < b)
return a;
return b;
}
// No clone because of the different pattern in which the variables are used.
int min2(int a, int b) { // no-warning
log();
if (a > b)
return b;
return a;
}
int foo(int a, int b) { // no-warning
return a + b;
}
|
