From 288fadb796ec4e11e99e3752d531ada7edf15d75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Tismer Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 15:13:21 +0100 Subject: fix both qflags_test and the qflags cppgenerator code There was a years-old qflags test failing on Python 3. It was blacklisted with the comment "# Nested exception in Python 3" This was nonsense: The test was wrong also for Python 2. It just happened to work, because Python 2 had some weird errors leaking. The real bug was in missing error handling in cppgenerator.cpp . See the main description in the issue. Change-Id: Ia0f9466640e0eb33f1b8b26178d33f2be0bcb32f Task-number: PYSIDE-1442 Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint --- sources/pyside6/tests/QtCore/qflags_test.py | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'sources/pyside6') diff --git a/sources/pyside6/tests/QtCore/qflags_test.py b/sources/pyside6/tests/QtCore/qflags_test.py index 68d467265..f7bb5033f 100644 --- a/sources/pyside6/tests/QtCore/qflags_test.py +++ b/sources/pyside6/tests/QtCore/qflags_test.py @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ '''Test cases for QFlags''' +import operator import os import sys import unittest @@ -117,12 +118,13 @@ class QFlagsOnQVariant(unittest.TestCase): class QFlagsWrongType(unittest.TestCase): def testWrongType(self): '''Wrong type passed to QFlags binary operators''' + for op in operator.or_, operator.and_, operator.xor: + for x in '43', 'jabba', QObject, object: + self.assertRaises(TypeError, op, Qt.NoItemFlags, x) + self.assertRaises(TypeError, op, x, Qt.NoItemFlags) + # making sure this actually does not fail all the time + self.assertEqual(operator.or_(Qt.NoItemFlags, 43), 43) - self.assertRaises(TypeError, Qt.NoItemFlags | '43') - self.assertRaises(TypeError, Qt.NoItemFlags & '43') - self.assertRaises(TypeError, 'jabba' & Qt.NoItemFlags) - self.assertRaises(TypeError, 'hut' & Qt.NoItemFlags) - self.assertRaises(TypeError, Qt.NoItemFlags & QObject()) if __name__ == '__main__': unittest.main() -- cgit v1.2.3