1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
|
.. _words-of-advice:
***************
Words of Advice
***************
When writing or using Python bindings there is some things you must keep in mind.
.. _duck-punching-and-virtual-methods:
Duck punching and virtual methods
=================================
The combination of duck punching, the practice of altering class characteristics
of already instantiated objects, and virtual methods of wrapped C++ classes, can
be tricky. That was an optimistic statement.
Let's see duck punching in action for educational purposes.
.. code-block:: python
import types
import Binding
obj = Binding.CppClass()
# CppClass has a virtual method called 'virtualMethod',
# but we don't like it anymore.
def myVirtualMethod(self_obj, arg):
pass
obj.virtualMethod = types.MethodType(myVirtualMethod, obj, Binding.CppClass)
If some C++ code happens to call `CppClass::virtualMethod(...)` on the C++ object
held by "obj" Python object, the new duck punched "virtualMethod" method will be
properly called. That happens because the underlying C++ object is in fact an instance
of a generated C++ class that inherits from `CppClass`, let's call it `CppClassWrapper`,
responsible for receiving the C++ virtual method calls and finding out the proper Python
override to which handle such a call.
Now that you know this, consider the case when C++ has a factory method that gives you
new C++ objects originated somewhere in C++-land, in opposition to the ones generated in
Python-land by the usage of class constructors, like in the example above.
Brief interruption to show what I was saying:
.. code-block:: python
import types
import Binding
obj = Binding.createCppClass()
def myVirtualMethod(self_obj, arg):
pass
# Punching a dead duck...
obj.virtualMethod = types.MethodType(myVirtualMethod, obj, Binding.CppClass)
The `Binding.createCppClass()` factory method is just an example, C++ created objects
can pop out for a number of other reasons. Objects created this way have a Python wrapper
holding them as usual, but the object held is not a `CppClassWrapper`, but a regular
`CppClass`. All virtual method calls originated in C++ will stay in C++ and never reach
a Python virtual method overridden via duck punching.
Although duck punching is an interesting Python feature, it don't mix well with wrapped
C++ virtual methods, specially when you can't tell the origin of every single wrapped
C++ object. In summary: don't do it!
.. _pyside-old-style-class:
Python old style classes and PySide
===================================
Because of some architectural decisions and deprecated Python types. Since PySide 1.1 old style classes are not supported with multiple inheritance.
Below you can check the examples:
Example with old style class:
.. code-block:: python
from PySide import QtCore
class MyOldStyleObject:
pass
class MyObject(QtCore, MyOldStyleObject):
pass
this example will raise a 'TypeError' due to the limitation on PySide, to fix this you will need use the new style class:
.. code-block:: python
from PySide import QtCore
class MyOldStyleObject(object):
pass
class MyObject(QtCore, MyOldStyleObject):
pass
All classes used for multiple inheritance with other PySide types need to have 'object' as base class.
|
