summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>2016-05-26 08:30:26 +0200
committerMarc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>2017-03-10 08:24:41 +0000
commit5cc0de2e084cb887a75b076b82cf470ecdcd4dd3 (patch)
tree1224e3ca3f635c881d0b520adb019ab696b1e7a2
parent9ed389bf15787266c207435d712b9e225db07ad9 (diff)
QAtomic: pass explicit failure memory order to std::atomic::compare_exchange_strong
GCC 4.8 seems to get the failure memory order wrong when using the overload that only accepts one memory order and produces errors such as: bits/atomic_base.h:577:70: error: failure memory model cannot be stronger than success memory model for '__atomic_compare_exchange' return __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&_M_i, &__i1, __i2, 0, __m1, __m2); ^ (as seen on Android). Fix by explicitly passing the failure orders corresponding to the success orders, as specified by the standard: relaxed → relaxed release → relaxed acquire → acquire acq_rel → acquire (cf. http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/atomic/atomic/compare_exchange). Task-number: QTBUG-59399 Change-Id: If046e735888cf331d2d6506d8d5ca9aa7402f9ad Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com> Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
-rw-r--r--src/corelib/arch/qatomic_cxx11.h8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/corelib/arch/qatomic_cxx11.h b/src/corelib/arch/qatomic_cxx11.h
index 63b23b71ab..484ec73e7f 100644
--- a/src/corelib/arch/qatomic_cxx11.h
+++ b/src/corelib/arch/qatomic_cxx11.h
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ template <typename X> struct QAtomicOps
template <typename T>
static bool testAndSetRelaxed(std::atomic<T> &_q_value, T expectedValue, T newValue, T *currentValue = Q_NULLPTR) Q_DECL_NOTHROW
{
- bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_relaxed);
+ bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_relaxed, std::memory_order_relaxed);
if (currentValue)
*currentValue = expectedValue;
return tmp;
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ template <typename X> struct QAtomicOps
template <typename T>
static bool testAndSetAcquire(std::atomic<T> &_q_value, T expectedValue, T newValue, T *currentValue = Q_NULLPTR) Q_DECL_NOTHROW
{
- bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_acquire);
+ bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_acquire, std::memory_order_acquire);
if (currentValue)
*currentValue = expectedValue;
return tmp;
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ template <typename X> struct QAtomicOps
template <typename T>
static bool testAndSetRelease(std::atomic<T> &_q_value, T expectedValue, T newValue, T *currentValue = Q_NULLPTR) Q_DECL_NOTHROW
{
- bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_release);
+ bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_release, std::memory_order_relaxed);
if (currentValue)
*currentValue = expectedValue;
return tmp;
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ template <typename X> struct QAtomicOps
template <typename T>
static bool testAndSetOrdered(std::atomic<T> &_q_value, T expectedValue, T newValue, T *currentValue = Q_NULLPTR) Q_DECL_NOTHROW
{
- bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_acq_rel);
+ bool tmp = _q_value.compare_exchange_strong(expectedValue, newValue, std::memory_order_acq_rel, std::memory_order_acquire);
if (currentValue)
*currentValue = expectedValue;
return tmp;