summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/auto/corelib/tools/qhash
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>2016-07-11 11:14:34 +0200
committerMarc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>2016-07-14 06:53:48 +0000
commitc2f4705f23ddccf075010edb0532fd73145b8b15 (patch)
treee35ca3cde5b3ae81b140dcb3d232067a988ee74e /tests/auto/corelib/tools/qhash
parent89152c57d864c6767daa5aead2adb3ae6bee482b (diff)
Add qHash(QHash) and qHash(QMultiHash)
The hash function is carefully designed to give the same result as the straight-forward implementation of qHash(unordered_map), which we'll probably add at some point, namely: std::accumulate over a container of std::pair. This is one reason to use std:: and not QPair in the implemen- tation of qHash(QHash). The other is that qHash(QPair) uses a bad hash combiner, which may xor out the 'seed' from the result. We can't fix that until Qt 6, but the qHash(std::pair) overload uses the well-known boost::hash_combine algorithm (implemented in Qt as QtPrivate::QHashCombine), so we can use that. I also trust std::pair to work without problems with reference template arguments, while QPair only very recently gained a very basic auto-test for reference parameters. [ChangeLog][QtCore] Added qHash() overloads for QHash, QMultiHash. Change-Id: I90879d8a99cf1aadb6e84ecc0c3704f52f3691da Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/auto/corelib/tools/qhash')
-rw-r--r--tests/auto/corelib/tools/qhash/tst_qhash.cpp64
1 files changed, 64 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/auto/corelib/tools/qhash/tst_qhash.cpp b/tests/auto/corelib/tools/qhash/tst_qhash.cpp
index cfd2bdc6f7..0b864e71d4 100644
--- a/tests/auto/corelib/tools/qhash/tst_qhash.cpp
+++ b/tests/auto/corelib/tools/qhash/tst_qhash.cpp
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ private slots:
void find(); // copied from tst_QMap
void constFind(); // copied from tst_QMap
void contains(); // copied from tst_QMap
+ void qhash();
void take(); // copied from tst_QMap
void operator_eq(); // copied from tst_QMap
void rehash_isnt_quadratic();
@@ -695,6 +696,69 @@ void tst_QHash::contains()
QVERIFY(!map1.contains(43));
}
+namespace {
+class QGlobalQHashSeedResetter
+{
+ int oldSeed;
+public:
+ // not entirely correct (may lost changes made by another thread between the query
+ // of the old and the setting of the new seed), but qSetGlobalQHashSeed doesn't
+ // return the old value, so this is the best we can do:
+ explicit QGlobalQHashSeedResetter(int newSeed)
+ : oldSeed(qGlobalQHashSeed())
+ {
+ qSetGlobalQHashSeed(newSeed);
+ }
+ ~QGlobalQHashSeedResetter()
+ {
+ qSetGlobalQHashSeed(oldSeed);
+ }
+};
+
+template <typename Key, typename T>
+QHash<T, Key> inverted(const QHash<Key, T> &in)
+{
+ QHash<T, Key> result;
+ for (auto it = in.begin(), end = in.end(); it != end; ++it)
+ result[it.value()] = it.key();
+ return result;
+}
+
+template <typename AssociativeContainer>
+void make_test_data(AssociativeContainer &c)
+{
+ c["one"] = "1";
+ c["two"] = "2";
+}
+
+}
+
+void tst_QHash::qhash()
+{
+ const QGlobalQHashSeedResetter seed1(0);
+
+ QHash<QString, QString> hash1;
+ make_test_data(hash1);
+ const QHash<QString, QString> hsah1 = inverted(hash1);
+
+ const QGlobalQHashSeedResetter seed2(1);
+
+ QHash<QString, QString> hash2;
+ make_test_data(hash2);
+ const QHash<QString, QString> hsah2 = inverted(hash2);
+
+ QCOMPARE(hash1, hash2);
+ QCOMPARE(hsah1, hsah2);
+ QCOMPARE(qHash(hash1), qHash(hash2));
+ QCOMPARE(qHash(hsah1), qHash(hsah2));
+
+ // by construction this is almost impossible to cause false collisions:
+ QVERIFY(hash1 != hsah1);
+ QVERIFY(hash2 != hsah2);
+ QVERIFY(qHash(hash1) != qHash(hsah1));
+ QVERIFY(qHash(hash2) != qHash(hsah2));
+}
+
//copied from tst_QMap
void tst_QHash::take()
{