Use QTRY_COMPARE in an attempt to make the test less flaky

The test function only runs on X11, and this might help with the
asynchronous nature of the client/server architecture, also for
drag'n'drop.

Change-Id: I38db9104e304e57c36f84932d13f8dfae7452883
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
(cherry picked from commit ee025760cf7040d2864327c9bd478f7d0792a79f)

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/tests/auto/widgets/itemviews/qlistview/tst_qlistview.cpp b/tests/auto/widgets/itemviews/qlistview/tst_qlistview.cpp
index 941ff52373..04c6acfea1 100644
--- a/tests/auto/widgets/itemviews/qlistview/tst_qlistview.cpp
+++ b/tests/auto/widgets/itemviews/qlistview/tst_qlistview.cpp
@@ -2707,12 +2707,12 @@ void tst_QListView::internalDragDropMove()
 
     list.startDrag(Qt::MoveAction);
 
-    QCOMPARE(data.stringList(), expectedData);
+    QTRY_COMPARE(data.stringList(), expectedData);
 
      // if the model doesn't implement moveRows, or if items are replaced, then selection is lost
     if (modelMoves && !(itemFlags & Qt::ItemIsDropEnabled)) {
         const QStringList actualSelected = getSelectedTexts();
-        QCOMPARE(actualSelected, expectedSelected);
+        QTRY_COMPARE(actualSelected, expectedSelected);
     }
 }