Remove all non-inline of qMalloc/qFree/qRealloc.

We're trying to deprecate these, so don't use them anymore.

The inline uses of these have been left intact, for the moment. Inline code will
need to create their own non-inline allocation methods (for future-proofing to
allow alterations in how e.g. individual containers allocate)

Change-Id: I1071a487c25e95b7bb81a3327b20c5481fb5ed22
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bradley T. Hughes <bradley.hughes@nokia.com>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/tests/benchmarks/network/access/qnetworkreply/tst_qnetworkreply.cpp b/tests/benchmarks/network/access/qnetworkreply/tst_qnetworkreply.cpp
index d30dafbe4a..81f9c1a3e8 100644
--- a/tests/benchmarks/network/access/qnetworkreply/tst_qnetworkreply.cpp
+++ b/tests/benchmarks/network/access/qnetworkreply/tst_qnetworkreply.cpp
@@ -690,15 +690,15 @@ public:
             QSharedPointer<char> data = downloadBufferAttribute.value<QSharedPointer<char> >();
         } else if (testType == DownloadBufferButUseRead) {
             // We had a download buffer but we benchmark here the "legacy" read() way to access it
-            char* replyData = (char*) qMalloc(uploadSize);
+            char* replyData = (char*) malloc(uploadSize);
             QVERIFY(reply->read(replyData, uploadSize) == uploadSize);
-            qFree(replyData);
+            free(replyData);
         } else if (testType == NoDownloadBuffer) {
             // We did not have a download buffer but we still need to benchmark having the data, e.g. reading it all.
             // This should be the slowest benchmark result.
-            char* replyData = (char*) qMalloc(uploadSize);
+            char* replyData = (char*) malloc(uploadSize);
             QVERIFY(reply->read(replyData, uploadSize) == uploadSize);
-            qFree(replyData);
+            free(replyData);
         }
 
         QMetaObject::invokeMethod(&QTestEventLoop::instance(), "exitLoop", Qt::QueuedConnection);