summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/corelib/tools/qvarlengtharray.qdoc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/corelib/tools/qvarlengtharray.qdoc')
-rw-r--r--src/corelib/tools/qvarlengtharray.qdoc6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/src/corelib/tools/qvarlengtharray.qdoc b/src/corelib/tools/qvarlengtharray.qdoc
index 1a0579a077..e1dc2bee9a 100644
--- a/src/corelib/tools/qvarlengtharray.qdoc
+++ b/src/corelib/tools/qvarlengtharray.qdoc
@@ -69,13 +69,13 @@
structure. The main differences between the two classes are:
\list
- \o QVarLengthArray's API is much more low-level. It provides no
+ \li QVarLengthArray's API is much more low-level. It provides no
iterators and lacks much of QVector's functionality.
- \o QVarLengthArray doesn't initialize the memory if the value is
+ \li QVarLengthArray doesn't initialize the memory if the value is
a basic type. (QVector always does.)
- \o QVector uses \l{implicit sharing} as a memory optimization.
+ \li QVector uses \l{implicit sharing} as a memory optimization.
QVarLengthArray doesn't provide that feature; however, it
usually produces slightly better performance due to reduced
overhead, especially in tight loops.