| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
replace the custom QT_NO_STD_ATOMIC64 with a regular public feature, and
give libatomic an empty source rather than using a separate config test.
Change-Id: Iaf4a7f4c4874f61bf93aa58fe41843a86baf1ab7
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
std::atomic::compare_exchange_strong
GCC 4.8 seems to get the failure memory order wrong when using the
overload that only accepts one memory order and produces errors such
as:
bits/atomic_base.h:577:70: error: failure memory model cannot be stronger than success memory model for '__atomic_compare_exchange'
return __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&_M_i, &__i1, __i2, 0, __m1, __m2);
^
(as seen on Android).
Fix by explicitly passing the failure orders corresponding to the
success orders, as specified by the standard:
relaxed → relaxed
release → relaxed
acquire → acquire
acq_rel → acquire
(cf. http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/atomic/atomic/compare_exchange).
Task-number: QTBUG-59399
Change-Id: If046e735888cf331d2d6506d8d5ca9aa7402f9ad
Reviewed-by: David Faure <david.faure@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's not possible to build Qt with gcc 4.7 since
aca0e367be9cdc3b48f09200f4eadbcfe5a574c8 because of the bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473 that doesn't
allow to specialize static members declared both as constexpr
and noexcept. That commit was made after 5.7.0 and it introduced
QAtomicTraits::isLockFree() with these specifiers.
Remove the noexcept specifier to fix building.
Change-Id: Ifc2462c90de1180f1e015fdc0646f246d33e68b0
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When I introduced this code in Qt 5.0, I made INT and POINTER be
SOMETIMES_NATIVE, but then later I made the specific sizes be
ALWAYS_NATIVE. That doesn't make sense.
Instead, use the macros from the C++11 <atomic> header.
Note that the member isXxxxNative() functions should not have been
constexpr. That's a defect I introduced in Qt 5.0.
Task-number: QTBUG-51315
Change-Id: I0c94a5c2846b48c8aea7ffff1436013e8686c153
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
src/android/jar/src/org/qtproject/qt5/android/QtActivityDelegate.java
src/plugins/platforms/windows/qwindowsfontengine.cpp
src/plugins/platforms/windows/qwindowsnativeimage.cpp
tests/auto/gui/kernel/qwindow/BLACKLIST
tests/auto/gui/kernel/qwindow/tst_qwindow.cpp
Change-Id: I649b32b260ce0ed2d6a5089021daa0d6a8db85f7
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
... or similar.
This amends previous commits that converted the majority of
cases.
Task-number: QTBUG-45291
Change-Id: I219cdeddca7063a56efeb4fee0e5bb2cbdc7732b
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I wrote a script to help find the files, but I reviewed the
contributions manually to be sure I wasn't claiming copyright for search
& replace, adding Q_DECL_NOTHROW or adding "We mean it" headers.
Change-Id: I7a9e11d7b64a4cc78e24ffff142b506368fc8842
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From Qt 5.7 -> LGPL v2.1 isn't an option anymore, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/
Updated license headers to use new LGPL header instead of LGPL21 one
(in those files which will be under LGPL v3)
Change-Id: I046ec3e47b1876cd7b4b0353a576b352e3a946d9
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The C++ standard says it must, but some badly-configured toolchains seem
to be lacking support.
In particular, for some 32-bit platforms without native support for
them, GCC implements 64-bit atomics via out-of-line functions in
libatomic. If that library is missing... well, then std::atomic 64-bit
doesn't work and we mustn't try to use it.
This was found when trying to compile Qt 5.6 for MIPS 32-bit:
Linking library libQt5Core.so.5.6.0
.obj/qsimd.o: In function `std::__atomic_base<unsigned long long>::load(std::memory_order) const':
/opt/poky/1.7/sysroots/mips32r2-poky-linux/usr/include/c++/4.9.1/bits/atomic_base.h:500: undefined reference to `__atomic_load_8'
.obj/qsimd.o: In function `std::__atomic_base<unsigned long long>::store(unsigned long long, std::memory_order)':
/opt/poky/1.7/sysroots/mips32r2-poky-linux/usr/include/c++/4.9.1/bits/atomic_base.h:478: undefined reference to `__atomic_store_8'
Yocto bug report: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8274
Change-Id: I42e7ef1a481840699a8dffff140224d6614e5c36
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can't have too many braces: one pair is just enough because we're
actually calling the QBasicAtomicInt's constructor. That is, we're using
the uniform initialization procedure.
Required for Clang 3.7:
qmetatype.h:1772:46: error: braces around scalar initializer [-Werror,-Wbraced-scalar-init]
static QBasicAtomicInt metatype_id = Q_BASIC_ATOMIC_INITIALIZER(0);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
qatomic_cxx11.h:331:43: note: expanded from macro 'Q_BASIC_ATOMIC_INITIALIZER'
#define Q_BASIC_ATOMIC_INITIALIZER(a) { {a} }
^~~
Change-Id: Ib306f8f647014b399b87ffff13f1f2db1fabe393
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
And add tests for the GCC intrinsics and for std::atomic.
Task-number: QTBUG-43794
Change-Id: Ic5d393bfd36e48a193fcffff13b9b2dbaee80469
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Qt copyrights are now in The Qt Company, so we could update the source
code headers accordingly. In the same go we should also fix the links to
point to qt.io.
Outdated header.LGPL removed (use header.LGPL21 instead)
Old header.LGPL3 renamed to header.LGPL3-COMM to match actual licensing
combination. New header.LGPL-COMM taken in the use file which were
using old header.LGPL3 (src/plugins/platforms/android/extract.cpp)
Added new header.LGPL3 containing Commercial + LGPLv3 + GPLv2 license
combination
Change-Id: I6f49b819a8a20cc4f88b794a8f6726d975e8ffbe
Reviewed-by: Matti Paaso <matti.paaso@theqtcompany.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Renamed LICENSE.LGPL to LICENSE.LGPLv21
- Added LICENSE.LGPLv3
- Removed LICENSE.GPL
Change-Id: Iec3406e3eb3f133be549092015cefe33d259a3f2
Reviewed-by: Iikka Eklund <iikka.eklund@digia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is extremely useful, since the most common action after a failed
compare-and-swap is to loop around, trying again with the current
value as found in memory.
Code currently written as:
do {
Type value = atomic.load();
...
} while (!atomic.testAndSetRelaxed(value, desired));
Becomes:
Type value = atomic.load();
do {
...
} while (!atomic.testAndSetRelaxed(value, desired, value));
In most CPU architectures, the value that was found in memory is known
to the compare-and-swap code, so this is more efficient than the
previous code. In architectures where the value is not known, the new
code is no worse than before.
The implementation sometimes modified an existing function, sometimes
it added a new one, depending on whether more registers were needed in
the assembly (like ARMv6-7), the code became more complex (ARMv5), the
optimizer failed (C++11), or it was just plain equivalent (MIPS).
Change-Id: I7d6d200ea9746ec8978a0c1e1969dbc3580b9285
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This simplifies the code a lot and avoids silly mistakes where a
specific integer type is missing (such as char16_t).
Change-Id: Id91dfd1919e783e0a9af7bfa093ca560a01b22d1
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No need to redefine everywhere, since they're required to be supported.
Change-Id: I2bdbbd0b0c44871e3bd0edcf0289fc58dd50ff31
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In qatomic_cxx11, the 'Type' is std::atomic<T>, whose fetch_add method,
used in fetchAndAdd*(), already does the right thing for T* with sizeof(T) > 1.
The code, however, applied 'AddScale' to the 'valueToAdd', thus becoming
incompatible with normal pointer arithmetics.
This is very apparent when one goes to the length of actually testing
qatomic_cxx11 with tst_QAtomicPointer (which is non-trivial, since the
-c++11 configure option currently doesn't have an effect on tests/auto).
To fix, remove the AddScale factor.
Change-Id: I7507203af3b7df31d8322b31a6a1a33ca847d224
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both Clang and ICC complain about the use of those atomics when used
with a forward-declared pointee. GCC doesn't, which makes me think
it's a GCC bug.
When using QBasicAtomicPointer<Foo> with these atomics, the _q_value
member causes the instantiation of QAtomicOps<Foo>, which causes the
instantiation of the regular member function
QAtomicOps<Foo>::fetchAndAddRelaxed. The problem is that function
takes a QAtomicAdditiveType<Foo>::AdditiveT as parameter, which
requires sizeof(Foo). Clang 3.3 and ICC 14 correctly expand and
complain. GCC 4.7-4.9 apparently don't.
The fix is to apply the same trick we used for the other atomics:
change all ops functions (including fetchAndAddRelaxed) to be member
templates. That way, they can't be expanded until the actual use.
Clang errors:
qgenericatomic.h:73:33: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'QMutexData'
qatomic_gcc.h:136:48: note: in instantiation of template class 'QAtomicAdditiveType<QMutexData *>' requested here
qbasicatomic.h:272:22: note: in instantiation of template class 'QAtomicOps<QMutexData *>' requested here
ICC errors:
qgenericatomic.h(73): error: incomplete type is not allowed
detected during:
instantiation of class "QAtomicAdditiveType<T *> [with T=QMutexData]" at line 111 of "qatomic_cxx11.h"
instantiation of class "QAtomicOps<T> [with T=QMutexData *]" at line 272 of "qbasicatomic.h"
Found-by: Tor Arne
Change-Id: I9b10648cd47109a943b34a4c9926d77cd0c4fe12
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
QtCore has a few headers that, though public, aren't meant to be
included directly. Those are the atomic headers, the three _impl.h
headers and qt_windows.h.
QtGui includes two OpenGL headers that don't compile on their own.
Other libraries should not have headers like that (but they do,
something we need to fix eventually).
Change-Id: I55e4eb057748f47df927ee618f9409acbc189cc1
Reviewed-by: Sean Harmer <sean.harmer@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Gunnar Sletta <gunnar.sletta@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The macro was made empty in ba3dc5f3b56d1fab6fe37fe7ae08096d7dc68bcb
and is no longer necessary or used.
Discussed-on: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2013-January/009284.html
Change-Id: Id2bb2e2cabde059305d4af5f12593344ba30f001
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Papp <lpapp@kde.org>
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: hjk <hjk121@nokiamail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change copyrights and license headers from Nokia to Digia
Change-Id: If1cc974286d29fd01ec6c19dd4719a67f4c3f00e
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergio Ahumada <sergio.ahumada@digia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Those are regular, integer types, of 16- and 32-bit width,
respectively. C++11's std::atomic supports them, so we should too.
C++11 also supports wchar_t, but since that type's size can change, I
don't feel like support for it in Qt is pressing.
Change-Id: I945b641c91a8a98be82715f878c382dee58ac98b
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows one to write code that depends on these values at
compile-time.
Change-Id: I7d78524ed9c70d4141360496d1d764dcbfa92e62
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Actually, only the "new" atomics are marked. The old implementation,
based on qoldbasicatomic.h is unchanged, but should still work without a
problem.
The following configurations were tested and do work:
- x86 64-bit
- x86 32-bit
- generic GCC
- generic C++11 std::atomic
- bootstrap
- ARMv6 and 7
- MIPS
- MSVC 2010 32-bit
- MSVC 2010 64-bit
The only two configurations untested are IA-64 and ARMv5. Except for
MSVC, all configurations were tested with GCC 4.6 (MIPS and ARM) and 4.7
(x86 and generics).
Change-Id: Iecbfeacd9d20b535453e91335165e9a221e0b47e
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@nokia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is so we can insert valgrind (helgrind) annotation macros. They
require the actual address of the variable to work.
Change-Id: I988f6a46385ad58143c53ad34b6cf0f58be2cdb8
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most of these headers are either forwarding headers, or we explicitly
stop syncqt so that it doesn't generate class includes for the atomic
implementation. Either way, syncqt doesn't see the QT_END_* (and
sometimes not QT_BEGIN_*), which this commit fixes.
Change-Id: Icc8da6f384f38b1ff4eb265c731ce2f2ed92a1a3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As in the past, to avoid rewriting various autotests that contain
line-number information, an extra blank line has been inserted at the
end of the license text to ensure that this commit does not change the
total number of lines in the license header.
Change-Id: I311e001373776812699d6efc045b5f742890c689
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
|
|
The C++11 std::atomic type is very close to our API, to the point one
has to wonder if the committe was inspired by it. It provides all of
the memory semantics that Qt requires and more, plus some
compare-and-swap operations that we don't use.
The idea of returning the actual value in the event of a failed
compare-and-swap is actually quite good, as often we'll retry with
it. We just couldn't come up with a good name (fetchAndTestAndSet?).
The C++11 atomics require that the compiler support constexpr as well,
since std::atomic itself isn't required by the standard to be
trivially-constructible (in fact, it has a constexpr constructor in
the standard). For that reason, we need constexpr so we can add a
constructor to QBasicAtomic too.
Change-Id: I12c51455ba73350a6f7501aacc2ca7681c4369dd
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@woboq.com>
|