| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I61ecce6b1324410bbab4fffd153d5d362d4429bb
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unlike qdatastream.h, we can be ready for future versions. Current plans
say we should do Qt 5.12 and then begin working on 6.0.
Change-Id: I38341f8155354cc4a776fffd14e13c2f1362b483
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Agocs <laszlo.agocs@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From Qt 5.7 -> tools & applications are lisenced under GPL v3 with some
exceptions, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/
Updated license headers to use new GPL-EXCEPT header instead of LGPL21 one
(in those files which will be under GPL 3 with exceptions)
Change-Id: I42a473ddc97101492a60b9287d90979d9eb35ae1
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From Qt 5.7 -> LGPL v2.1 isn't an option anymore, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/
Updated license headers to use new LGPL header instead of LGPL21 one
(in those files which will be under LGPL v3)
Change-Id: I046ec3e47b1876cd7b4b0353a576b352e3a946d9
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Somehow qmake doesn't add the correct rules for the Android makefiles,
so the build fails when cross-compiling from Windows. The reason for
that is unknown (could be related to that "qt_android_deps" config, but
that isn't used anywhere in qmake or the buildsystem).
This isn't likely to be a problem, since there are no global installs of
Qt on Android.
Change-Id: I1d0f78915b5942aab07cffff140f95ce32324030
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The only reason I had used them in the first place was because C
preprocessor macros cannot call themselves recursively. But the magic
was too magic and caused issues with some builds, so let's choose the
safer option.
Anyway, this solution now works for all ELF architectures, independent
of the processor, whereas previously it was restricted to x86 and Linux/
FreeBSD. However, this does not apply to the assembly in
qversiontagging.h.
Change-Id: I42e7ef1a481840699a8dffff1404f032fc5cacb8
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The .altmacro is not supported with Clang's integrated assembly.
The worst part is that I had this fixed, but apparently I never pushed
the update to Gerrit and then we staged the old version. This commit
brings back the fixes.
Incidentally, it also makes things work with freebsd-clang.
Change-Id: Id2a5d90d07d7ee470fcb9ad9696a9a0f9ced7ea7
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@theqtcompany.com>
|
|
|
This symbol will exist with different ELF versions, allowing us to know
which version of Qt a given library or application was linked
against. When this symbol gets used, automatic packaging tools will
extract the dependency. The trick here is that the application uses
qt_version_tag without knowing which version is current, but the linker
resolves it to the current version and records that.
For example, if this were used with Qt 5.5, RPM's find-requires on an
application using QtCore would print:
libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit)
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.5)(64bit)
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
Whereas find-provides on QtCore would print:
libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit)
libQt5Core.so.5(libQt5Core.so.5)(64bit)
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.0)(64bit)
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.1)(64bit)
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.2)(64bit)
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.3)(64bit)
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.4)(64bit)
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.5)(64bit)
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
Therefore, automatic dependency resolution would have the information it
needs to conclude that the application requires Qt >= 5.5.
Change-Id: I049a653beeb5454c9539ffff13e3fec9aeb50197
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
