| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clang (I guess it was clang) reports:
io/qipaddress.cpp:276:34: warning: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'; '+' will be evaluated first [-Wparentheses]
Fix the precedence by wrapping the ternary expression in parentheses.
Change-Id: I1c995dc8e2b1b831480ea8f8a695f7f89c08fcac
Reviewed-by: João Abecasis <joao.abecasis@nokia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Similarly, only test against the libc function on Linux, as other OS
sometimes have different behaviour.
Change-Id: I9b8ef9a3d660a59882396d695202865ca307e528
Reviewed-by: João Abecasis <joao.abecasis@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shane Kearns <shane.kearns@accenture.com>
|
|
In the unit test, check against inet_aton on Linux with GLIBC
only. Other platforms have this function too, but they sometimes have
different behaviour, so don't try to test them equally.
Change-Id: I1a77e405ac7e713d4cf1cee03ea5ce17fb47feef
Reviewed-by: João Abecasis <joao.abecasis@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shane Kearns <shane.kearns@accenture.com>
|