| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new methods return true if the string contains valid UTF-8
encoded data, or false otherwise.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QByteArray] Added isValidUtf8() method.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QByteArrayView] Added isValidUtf8() method.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QUtf8StringView] Added isValidUtf8() method.
Task-number: QTBUG-92021
Change-Id: I5d0cb613265d98b1f189c5f5cc09c1f7db302272
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that we don't need '\0'-termination on the data, this is possible.
Moved QByteArray's tests to tst_QByteArrayApiSymmetry and added some
more test-cases.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QByteArrayView] Added numeric parsing methods.
Change-Id: Ic0df91ecfe5dbf6f008d344dd0464d7927f32273
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When trying to fix 0-length matches at the end of a QString,
be83ff65c424cff1036e7da19d6175826d9f7ed9 actually introduced a
regression due to how lastIndexOf interprets its `from` parameter.
The "established" (=legacy) interpretation of a negative `from` is that
it is supposed to indicate that we want the last match at offset `from +
size()`. With the default from of -1, that means we want a match
starting at most at position `size() - 1` inclusive, i.e. *at* the last
position in the string. The aforementioned commit changed that, by
allowing a match at position `size()` instead, and this behavioral
change broke code.
The problem the commit tried to fix was that empty matches *are* allowed
to happen at position size(): the last match of regexp // inside the
string "test" is indeed at position 4 (the regexp matches 5 times).
Changing the meaning of negative from to include that last position (in
general: to include position `from+size()+1` as the last valid matching
position, in case of a negative `from`) has unfortunately broken client
code. Therefore, we need to revert it. This patch does that, adapting
the tests as necessary (drive-by: a broken #undef is removed).
Reverting the patch however is not sufficient. What we are facing here
is an historical API mistake that forces the default `from` (-1) to
*skip* the truly last possible match; the mistake is that thre is simply
no way to pass a negative `from` and obtain that match. This means that
the revert will now cause code like this:
str.lastIndexOf(QRE("")); // `from` defaulted to -1
NOT to return str.size(), which is counter-intuitive and wrong. Other
APIs expose this inconsistency: for instance, using
QRegularExpressionIterator would actually yield a last match at position
str.size(). Similarly, using QString::count would return `str.size()+1`.
Note that, in general, it's still possible for clients to call
str.lastIndexOf(~~~, str.size())
to get the "truly last" match.
This patch also tries to fix this case ("have our cake and eat it").
First and foremost, a couple of bugs in QByteArray and QString code are
fixed (when dealing with 0-length needles).
Second, a lastIndexOf overload is added. One overload is the "legacy"
one, that will honor the pre-existing semantics of negative `from`. The
new overload does NOT take a `from` parameter at all, and will actually
match from the truly end (by simply calling `lastIndexOf(~~~, size())`
internally).
These overloads are offered for all the existing lastIndexOf()
overloads, not only the ones taking QRE.
This means that code simply using `lastIndexOf` without any `from`
parameter get the "correct" behavior for 0-length matches, and code that
specifies one gets the legacy behavior. Matches of length > 0 are not
affected anyways, as they can't match at position size().
[ChangeLog][Important Behavior Changes] A regression in the behavior of
the lastIndexOf() function on text-related containers and views
(QString, QStringView, QByteArray, QByteArrayView, QLatin1String) has
been fixed, and the behavior made consistent and more in line with
user expectations. When lastIndexOf() is invoked with a negative `from`
position, the last match has now to start at the last character in the
container/view (before, it was at the position *past* the last
character). This makes a difference when using lastIndexOf() with a
needle that has 0 length (for instance an empty string, a regular
expression that can match 0 characters, and so on); any other case is
unaffected. To retrieve the "truly last" match, one can pass a
positive `from` offset to lastIndexOf() (basically, pass `size()` as the
`from` parameter). To make calls such as `text.lastIndexOf(~~~);`, that
do not pass any `from` parameter, behave properly, a new lastIndexOf()
overload has been added to all the text containers/views. This overload
does not take a `from` parameter at all, and will search starting from
one character past the end of the text, therefore returning a correct
result when used with needles that may yield 0-length matches. Client
code may need to be recompiled in order to use this new overload.
Conversely, client code that needs to skip the "truly last" match now
needs to pass -1 as the `from` parameter instead of relying on the
default.
Change-Id: I5e92bdcf1a57c2c3cca97b6adccf0883d00a92e5
Fixes: QTBUG-94215
Pick-to: 6.2
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unlike simplified(), it just moves the end-points, without needing to
modify contents, so it makes sense (as for QStringView and
QLatin1String) to provide it. Moved QByteArray's trimmed() tests to
tst_QByteArrayApiSymmetry so that QBAV can now share them.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QByteArrayView] Added trimmed().
Change-Id: Ifd7a752adb5f3d3e2ad0aa8220efa7e7d2d39baa
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was previously no way to compare QByteArrayView to with another
QByteArrayView case-insensitively without allocating memory.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QByteArrayView] Added compare(), enabling case
sensitive and insensitive comparison with other QByteArrayViews.
Change-Id: I7582cc414563ddbde26da35a568421edcc649f93
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most of them go to qbytearrayalgorithms.h while the deprecated (inline)
version of qChecksum goes to qbytearrayview.h
In preparation for adding compare to QByteArrayView.
Change-Id: If7f65e9e7cd74838e11ebdb952309b811cef079d
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Looks like these ones have been forgotten in the Qt 5 -> 6 upgrade
to qsizetype. Change them to return qsizetype as well,
and fix the docs. Being entirely inline, non-exported classes, we
should be able to get away with it without affecting binary
compatibility. Moreover, there's no reason for keeping them
deprecated.
Requires some minor adjustments, just like the ones done for
size()'s changes.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QStringView] The length() function
now returns `qsizetype`, not `int`, for consistency with the
other string and container classes in Qt. Following this
change, it has been un-deprecated.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QAnyStringView] The length() function
now returns `qsizetype`, not `int`, for consistency with the
other string and container classes in Qt. Following this
change, it has been un-deprecated.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QUtf8StringView] The length() function
now returns `qsizetype`, not `int`, for consistency with the
other string and container classes in Qt. Following this
change, it has been un-deprecated.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QByteArrayView] The length() function
now returns `qsizetype`, not `int`, for consistency with the
other string and container classes in Qt. Following this
change, it has been un-deprecated.
Fixes: QTBUG-92496
Change-Id: Ie0f4939d1083884e95d4725f891b6c6764532cb8
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Provide simplified declaration of fromArray for qdoc runs; fix a small typo.
Change-Id: I8c7300a014270e8ab7f18afd94ee66af4734e0c7
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. Make the ctor unable to construct a QByteArrayView from
array literals other than 'char'.
With the new behavior it would either be (very likely) unintended to
pass e.g. a std::byte array to the ctor. And it would be confusing
because you would get different sizes based on signed-ness.
2. Introduce fromArray
Only supports array literals. Constructs a view of the full size.
Explicit so it shouldn't be surprising.
Change-Id: Ifdb55eb21057dfe7053b2561bd81e2c9825e9bc6
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both normal and relaxed constexpr are required by our new minimum of
C++17.
Change-Id: Ic028b88a2e7a6cb7d5925f3133b9d54859a81744
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
QByteArrayView's comparison operators are declared in the global
namespace, which can collide with the ones declared for other types that
are implicitly convertible to QByteArrayView (see the example attached to
the bugreport). Changing them to be hidden friends will make them visible
only when at least one of the operands is a QByteArrayView, so the
ambiguity will be avoided.
Fixes: QTBUG-85880
Change-Id: Ic3582269d9bda9a2105336ef0f044ea619af37ba
Reviewed-by: Marco Bubke <marco.bubke@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
|
|
|
Created a QByteArrayView in symmetry with QStringView.
Added the basic tests symmetrical to QStringView tests.
Moved the implementations of non-modifying methods of QByteArray to
namespace QtPrivate, to be reused inline from both QByteArray and
QByteArrayView. Changed QByteArray's counterparts of those methods to
take QByteArrayView as argument instead of QByteArray. Removed
QByteArray's operator QNoImplicitBoolCast(), because it was causing
ambiguity when calling those methods with QByteArray argument (it was
there to perevnt if(!ba)/if(ba) from compiling, but currently that would
be ambiguous and won't compile anyway).
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QByteArrayView] New class.
Task-number: QTBUG-84321
Change-Id: I05f92e654cf65c95f2bb31b9c9018746ac110426
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
