| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
... instead of QT_PREPEND_NAMESPACE(qHash), which is qualified (prepends at least '::'), and therefore disables ADL.
This is not a problem as long as we wrote our qHash() overloads as free functions (incl. non-hidden friends), but it should™ fail for hidden friends, so use the old using-std::swap() trick to bring QT_PREPEND_NAMESPACE(qHash) into scope, proceeding with an unqualified lookup.
Pick-to: 6.2
Change-Id: I00860b2313699849f86bfe3dd9f41db4ce993cd3
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There were two problems here: first, qHash(std::pair) must be declared
before qHashMulti that might call back to qHash(std::pair) (i.e., a pair
with one element that is also a pair). But moving the declaration above
causes the second problem: the noexcept expression can't refer to qHash
functions that aren't declared yet. So we forward-declare a constexpr
function for that result, but implement it far below.
Fixes: QTBUG-92910
Change-Id: Ia8e48103a54446509e3bfffd16767ed2e29b026c
Reviewed-by: Christian Kandeler <christian.kandeler@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
That's two years from when the replacements were added (6.2).
Change-Id: Id2983978ad544ff79911fffd1671f7dd38fede02
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is noexcept, except when initializing. When initializing, let's just
use qEnvironmentVariableIntValue (which we should have used anyway),
which avoids the memory allocation and is noexcept. The QRandomGenerator
functions are not marked noexcept, but are mostly so: they can't throw
regular exceptions, but some implementations do call POSIX Thread
Cancellation Points, which may cause forced stack unwinding. That's
unlikely to happen at the moment of the QHash initialization.
This is also mitigated in the next commit.
Change-Id: Id2983978ad544ff79911fffd1671fd16f8d6378d
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 37e0953613ef9a3db137bc8d3076441d9ae317d9 added a to-do, but we
can actually change the type, since we've documented since Qt 5.10 that
setting a non-zero value (aside from -1) with qSetGlobalQHashSeed was
not allowed. Storing a value to be reset later is simply not supported.
Change-Id: Id2983978ad544ff79911fffd1671f7b5de284bab
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo@kdab.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stop going through the implicit int conversion.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QFlags] QFlags now has a qHash() overload.
Change-Id: Id380ed252695f24af2e8c239b650dcb6f44e2893
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The hashing seed's type has been changed from int to size_t in Qt 6.
However the functions setting/getting the seed, and the seed itself,
are still simply int, meaning that we've crippled our seeding.
Add a TODO to amend it.
Change-Id: Ie9dd177149ec299ccf16d4e31f9f4b065804cfed
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In some cases, the default equality operator for a class is not suitable
for using in hashing (for example because it uses fuzzy comparisons).
Add a qHashEquals() method that by default uses the equality operator, but
allows to tailor the operations that should be used when using the class
as a key in QHash.
Task-number: QTBUG-88966
Change-Id: I346cf0e6e923277a8b42a79e50342a1c2511fd80
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
(cherry picked from commit 5d8b586e73e37070b0303bee24372550854637eb)
Reviewed-by: Qt Cherry-pick Bot <cherrypick_bot@qt-project.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To support qHash overloads without a seed we have a qHash(T, size_t)
catch-all that calls qHash(T) and XORs the seed. The problem is
that this catch-all is not SFINAE friendly. For a type Foo which
does not have any qHash overload, we can't ask if qHash(Foo, size_t)
is callable because it would instantiate the catch-all and fail
to compile.
Add a suitable trait and enable_if.
Pick-to: 6.0
Change-Id: Idffd48a537eebaf77cee7030b8d91a302643ffde
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: Ibe796c398a8e5488b7203abb07aa54740744f1ab
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
C++20 via P1120 is deprecating arithmetic operations between
unrelated enumeration types, and GCC 10 is already complaining.
Hence, these operations might become illegal in C++23 or C++26 at
the latest.
A case of this that affects Qt is in key combinations: a
QKeySequence can be constructed by summing / ORing modifiers and a
key, for instance:
Qt::CTRL + Qt::Key_A
Qt::SHIFT | Qt::CTRL | Qt::Key_G (recommended, see below)
The problem is that the modifiers and the key belong to different
enumerations (and there's 2 enumerations for the modifier, and one
for the key).
To solve this: add a dedicated class to represent a combination of
keys, and operators between those enumerations to build instances
of this class.
I would've simply defined operator|, but again docs and pre-existing
code use operator+ as well, so added both to at least tackle simple
cases (modifier + key).
Multiple modifiers create a problem: operator+ between them yields
int, not the corresponding flags type (because operator+ is not
overloaded for this use case):
Qt::CTRL + Qt::SHIFT + Qt::Key_A
\__________________/ /
int /
\______________/
int
Not only this loses track of the datatypes involved, but it would
also then "add" the key (with NO warnings, now its int + enum, so
it's not mixing enums!) and yielding int again.
I don't want to special-case this; the point of the class is
that int is the wrong datatype. Everything works just fine when
using operator| instead:
Qt::CTRL | Qt::SHIFT | Qt::Key_A
\__________________/ /
Qt::Modifiers /
\______________/
QKeyCombination
So I'm defining operator+ so that the simple cases still work,
but also deprecating it.
Port some code around Qt to the new class. In certain cases,
it's a huge win for clarity. In some others, I've just added
the necessary casts to make it still compile without warnings,
without attempting refactorings.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QKeyCombination] New class to represent
a combination of a key and zero or more modifiers, to be used
when defining shortcuts or similar.
[ChangeLog][Potentially Source-Incompatible Changes] A keyboard
modifier (such as Qt::CTRL, Qt::AltModifier, etc.) should be
combined with a key (such as Qt::Key_A, Qt::Key_F1, etc.) by using
operator|, not operator+. The result is now an object of type
QKeyCombination, that stores the key and the modifiers.
Change-Id: I657a3a328232f059023fff69c5031ee31cc91dd6
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Export some private functions from QUtf8 to resolve
undefined symbols in Qt5Compat after moving QStringRef.
Task-number: QTBUG-84437
Change-Id: I9046dcb14ed520d8868a511d79da6e721e26f72b
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both normal and relaxed constexpr are required by our new minimum of
C++17.
Change-Id: Ic028b88a2e7a6cb7d5925f3133b9d54859a81744
Reviewed-by: Sona Kurazyan <sona.kurazyan@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Created a QByteArrayView in symmetry with QStringView.
Added the basic tests symmetrical to QStringView tests.
Moved the implementations of non-modifying methods of QByteArray to
namespace QtPrivate, to be reused inline from both QByteArray and
QByteArrayView. Changed QByteArray's counterparts of those methods to
take QByteArrayView as argument instead of QByteArray. Removed
QByteArray's operator QNoImplicitBoolCast(), because it was causing
ambiguity when calling those methods with QByteArray argument (it was
there to perevnt if(!ba)/if(ba) from compiling, but currently that would
be ambiguous and won't compile anyway).
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QByteArrayView] New class.
Task-number: QTBUG-84321
Change-Id: I05f92e654cf65c95f2bb31b9c9018746ac110426
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Task-number: QTBUG-84319
Change-Id: If77bc94c18e8d522b4577050091cd7d7aa941311
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make QPair an alias for std::pair, and qMakePair just a forwarder
towards std::make_pair.
Why? Fundamentally to ditch a bunch of NIH code; gain for free
structured bindings, std::tuple and std::reference_wrapper
compatibility, and so on.
Breakages:
* Some that code manually forward declares QPair.
We don't care about it (<QContainerFwd> is the proper way).
* Some code that overloads on std::pair and QPair. Luckily
it's mostly centralized: debug, metatypes, testing macros.
Just remove the QPair overload.
* Usages of qMakePair forcing the template type parameters.
There are a handful of these in qtbase, but only one was actually
broken.
* std::pair is NOT (and will never likely be) trivially copiable.
This is agreed to be a mistake done by practically all implementations
in C++11, can can't be fixed without breaking ABI.
Some code using QPair assuming it's trivially copiable may break;
exactly one occurrence was in qtbase.
* QMetaType logic extracts the type names in two different ways,
one by looking at the source code string (e.g. extracted by moc)
and one via some ad-hoc reflection in C++. We need to make
"QPair" (as spelled in the source code) be the same as "std::pair"
(gathered via reflection, which will see through the alias)
when compared. The way it's already done e.g. for QList is
by actually replacing the moc-extracted name with the name
of the actual type used in C++; do the same here.
On libc++, std::pair is actually in an inline namespace --
i.e. std::__1::pair; the reflection will extract and store
"std::__1::pair" so we need an ad-hoc fix to QMetaType.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QPair] QPair is now an alias to std::pair,
and does not exist as a class in Qt any more. This may break
code such as functions overloaded for both QPair and std::pair.
Usually, the overload taking a QPair can be safely discarded,
leaving only the one taking a std::pair. QPair API has not changed,
and qMakePair is still available for compatibility (although
new code is encouraged to use std::pair and std::make_pair
directly instead).
Change-Id: I7725c751bf23946cde577b1406e86a336c0a3dcf
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a helper function so that we have a shortcut.
Instead of writing:
QHashCombine hash;
seed = hash(seed, fieldA);
seed = hash(seed, fieldB);
// etc.
return seed;
one can now simply write:
return qHashMulti(seed, fieldA, fieldB, fieldC);
Port a few usages inside qtbase as a demonstration.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QHash] Added the qHashMulti and
qHashMultiCommutative functions as convenience helpers
to calculate a hash from multiple variables (typically,
data members of a class).
Change-Id: I881a9ad41168df20ceecc6588a94abe7ddc6a532
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Except for (void and) bool, which we may not want to have
to avoid accidental implicit conversions.
Drive-by, rearrange qHash overloads to C++ types first,
and then Qt ones.
Change-Id: I9c4ecef5f28568d35ca52e339583851ce53b3bae
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Condition is a compile-time one.
Change-Id: I6e60f12cc51e96b2528c375017357c0631e2fc0b
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: Id5e091b135c006b10987f229f45319228edb8675
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I8728ba339161e210772e73c633cb2309dfb01b8e
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is required, so that QHash and QSet can hold more
than 2^32 items on 64 bit platforms.
The actual hashing functions for strings are still 32bit, this will
be changed in a follow-up commit.
Change-Id: I4372125252486075ff3a0b45ecfa818359fe103b
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The hash function provides rather good mixing of the input bits.
It spreads numbers out evenly through the uint range, a change of
one bit in the input changes around half the output bits, and it is
pretty fast.
Using this as a hash function over the simple hash(int) == int has the
advantage that it reduces the amount of collisions for badly distributed
keys. In addition, it allows us to always use power of two sizes for the
hash table, leading to better performance for inserts and lookups.
the 32 and 64 bit hash functions where chosen from
https://nullprogram.com/blog/2018/07/31/. I selected the ones that give
a very good distribution of the hash values while using the integer for
both multiplication steps. This should be slighty faster than using two
different numbers.
While the result is still being cast to a uint, the method is prepared
so it can handle 64 bit keys and seeds.
Fixes: QTBUG-29009
Change-Id: Id7a1b97b3c0d219e65de2e6e1fe6faf092f8ce16
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have a problem. Our types don't play well with the std unordered
containers, because they do not specialize std::hash. We therefore
force our users to come up with an implementation, hindering
interoperability, since any two developers are unlikely to come up
with compatible implementations. So combining libraries written by
different developers will result in ODR violations.
Now that we depend on C++11, and thus the presence of std::hash, we
still face the problem that the standard does not provide us with a
means to compose new hash functions out of old ones. In particular, we
cannot, yet, depend on C++17's std::hash<std::string_view> to
implement std::hash<QByteArray>, say. There's also no std::hash for
std::tuple, which would allow easy composition by using std::tie().
So piggy-back on the work we have done over the years on qHash()
functions, and implement the std::hash specializations for Qt types
using the existing qHash() functions, with a twist: The standard
allows implementations to provide means against predictable hash
values. Qt has this, too, but the seed is managed by the container and
passed to the qHash() function as a separate argument. The standard
does not have this explicit seed, so any protection must be implicit
in the normal use of std::hash.
To reap whatever protection that std library has on offer, if any, we
calculate a seed value by hashing int(0). This will be subject to
constant folding if there's no actual seed, but will produce a value
dependent on the seed if there is one.
Add some tests.
A question that remains is how to document the specialization. Can we
have a \stdhashable QDoc macro that does everything for us?
Task-number: QTBUG-33428
Change-Id: Idfe775f1661f8489587353c4b148d76611ac76f3
Reviewed-by: Mårten Nordheim <marten.nordheim@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
refs/staging/dev
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In preparation of Qt6 move away from pre-C++11 macros.
Change-Id: I44126693c20c18eca5620caab4f7e746218e0ce3
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|/
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I91ac9e714a465cab226b211812aa46e8fe5ff2ab
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way we can easily use them as keys in QHash and QSet.
Change-Id: Ie744c3b5ad1176ba2ab035c7e650af483757a0c9
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Two of the three functions were for functions that
should not be documented. The third was a function
protected by #ifndef Q_OS_DARWIN, which required a
test of Q_CLANG_QDOC in the header and cpp files.
Change-Id: Id2ab3e4f2ea896dc628a622de2e80a19c18eb9fe
Reviewed-by: Topi Reiniö <topi.reinio@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are some callers of qt_hash that first build a string just to hash it.
By allowing to pass an initial value for 'h', we can chain qt_hash() calls
to avoid having to allocate memory just to hash a two-part string.
Change-Id: Ifaca82d47b2fb8c707912342c3ddd84f91e70267
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[ChangeLog][QtCore] Added qHash(QStringView).
Change-Id: I69c9203cf301fe586e924168381884aab2e19e5c
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Anton Kudryavtsev <antkudr@mail.ru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I49d07689e642d26b4bceda5cace738aadd828ce0
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Anton Kudryavtsev <antkudr@mail.ru>
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
configure
src/3rdparty/angle/src/libANGLE/renderer/d3d/d3d11/Renderer11.cpp
src/network/access/qnetworkaccessmanager.cpp
src/plugins/platforms/cocoa/qcocoacolordialoghelper.mm
src/plugins/platforms/eglfs/deviceintegration/eglfs_kms/qeglfskmsgbmcursor.cpp
src/plugins/platforms/eglfs/deviceintegration/eglfs_kms/qeglfskmsgbmcursor.h
src/widgets/widgets/qlineedit_p.cpp
src/widgets/widgets/qlineedit_p.h
src/winmain/winmain.pro
tests/auto/corelib/io/qstorageinfo/tst_qstorageinfo.cpp
tests/auto/dbus/qdbusconnection/tst_qdbusconnection.cpp
tests/auto/dbus/qdbusconnection/tst_qdbusconnection.h
tests/auto/testlib/selftests/expected_cmptest.teamcity
tests/auto/testlib/selftests/expected_cmptest.txt
tests/auto/widgets/itemviews/qtableview/tst_qtableview.cpp
tools/configure/configureapp.cpp
Change-Id: Ib9997b0d0f91946e4081d36c0c6b696c5c983b2a
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The <QHash> only contains the container these days,
while <QHashFunctions> contains the qHash() function
overloads and related functions. This is where these
two functions belong, too.
This change is BC and SC, since qhash.h includes
qhashfunctions.h.
Change-Id: I2e7febb0ffca209af67fb9f2cd363596867a44e1
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
From Qt 5.7 -> LGPL v2.1 isn't an option anymore, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/
Updated license headers to use new LGPL header instead of LGPL21 one
(in those files which will be under LGPL v3)
Change-Id: I046ec3e47b1876cd7b4b0353a576b352e3a946d9
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We already include <utility> in <qglobal.h>, so we might
as well provide a qHash() overload for std::pair.
[ChangeLog][QtCore] Added qHash(std::pair), defined in
<QHashFunctions>.
Change-Id: I0f61c513e82e05ce9d2e56bcf18f3be9e2da4da9
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>
|
|
The reduces the amount of code the compiler has to parse when all
the header does is implement its own qHash().
I left the implementation in qhash.cpp, as it doesn't influence
qHash*() users.
Change-Id: Id320d690a33769bae78b03ccc3b08f7124123459
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@theqtcompany.com>
Reviewed-by: Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo@kdab.com>
|