| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the deadline is far in the future, the conversions to nanoseconds
or internal arithmetic may overflow and give an invalid object, thus
the deadline may end up in the past. Added a test to the testlib
selftest for sleep.
[ChangeLog][QtCore][QDeadlineTimer] Fixed integer overflows
leading to immediate timeouts.
Task-number: QTBUG-69750
Change-Id: I9814eccdf9f9b3add9ca66ec3e27e10cd5ad54a8
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently, the CI can run something over 1000x slower than on my
machine. We're getting over 100 ms delays in operations that shouldn't
have taken more than half a millisecond. The last report was of 136%
over budget, so I multiplied the resolution by 4.
Change-Id: I9093948278414644a416fffd1474406967b2a6ee
Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@qt.io>
|
|
|
It's like QElapsedTimer, but marks a time in the future instead.
[ChangeLog][QtCore] Added QDeadlineTimer, a counterpart to
QElapsedTimer, used to mark a time point in the future (a deadline) and
determine whether such a deadline has passed.
Change-Id: Ifea6e497f11a461db432ffff144921f7fbc1d1d3
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
