| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
First and foremost, the STL-style iterators don't do this. Those don't
provide a guarantee that the container won't get shared again while the
iterator is active.
Second, there's no protection against a second mutable iterator being
created and resetting the sharable flag back to true.
[ChangeLog][Important behavior changes] The mutable Java-style iterators
like QListMutableIterator and QHashMutableIterator no longer set the
parent container to unsharable mode. If you create a copy of the
container being iterated on after the iterator, any changes done with
the iterator might affect the copy too.
Discussed-on: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-February/015724.html
Change-Id: Iccfe411d5558c85ae459cff944215614c392388e
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@digia.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I4ca1862d29432ca83b90024664b548ea0eef26c0
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
warning: typedef 'Foo' locally defined but not used [-Wunused-local-typedefs]
Change-Id: Ifb1213414feb3aa5a5e46dac163e51ccd4925498
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
There is no reason to have the test separated from other tools tests.
Change-Id: Ie5b19961c383f5e4bc1ad4452cba7b92153fc303
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
