| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From Qt 5.7 -> tools & applications are lisenced under GPL v3 with some
exceptions, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/
Updated license headers to use new GPL-EXCEPT header instead of LGPL21 one
(in those files which will be under GPL 3 with exceptions)
Change-Id: I42a473ddc97101492a60b9287d90979d9eb35ae1
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@theqtcompany.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The keyword no longer has a meaning for the new CI.
Change-Id: Ibcea4c7a82fb7f982cf4569fdff19f82066543d1
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@theqtcompany.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Qt copyrights are now in The Qt Company, so we could update the source
code headers accordingly. In the same go we should also fix the links to
point to qt.io.
Outdated header.LGPL removed (use header.LGPL21 instead)
Old header.LGPL3 renamed to header.LGPL3-COMM to match actual licensing
combination. New header.LGPL-COMM taken in the use file which were
using old header.LGPL3 (src/plugins/platforms/android/extract.cpp)
Added new header.LGPL3 containing Commercial + LGPLv3 + GPLv2 license
combination
Change-Id: I6f49b819a8a20cc4f88b794a8f6726d975e8ffbe
Reviewed-by: Matti Paaso <matti.paaso@theqtcompany.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Renamed LICENSE.LGPL to LICENSE.LGPLv21
- Added LICENSE.LGPLv3
- Removed LICENSE.GPL
Change-Id: Iec3406e3eb3f133be549092015cefe33d259a3f2
Reviewed-by: Iikka Eklund <iikka.eklund@digia.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and make QByteArrayList be a simple typedef.
As a side-effect, the constructor taking a QByteArray is no longer
available since I couldn't find a way to add it to QList<T> when T is
QByteArray. My template-foo failed me. I tried:
- QEnableIf<is_same<T, QByteArray>::value, QByteArray>::type
=> makes QList fail to compile for any T that isn't QByteArray
- make the constructor a template member
=> it compiles if the parameter is a QByteArray, but not a const
char[4] like the test was
- inheriting constructors
=> runs into ICC and Clang bugs that I could not work around
Besides, the constructor with std::initializer_list is a superior
solution anyway.
Change-Id: Ic86fbadc1104142bfd907a5c4147199bf839fb89
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@digia.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Initial submission of a new class QByteArrayList with the
purpose of aggregating and then joining QByteArray instances.
[ChangeLog][QtCore] Added new QByteArrayList class.
Done-with: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Change-Id: I503af58f125d7f44fef10360177490c933e5840f
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commits f12b0f9a38c792abb13f3e6ecff4542986a6f96b
("QByteArrayList: optimize op+"),
f96f2fe3670bc8a32389795dc21b9839407465a1 ("Enable QByteArrayList
tests"), and 4f23f0530a9c59400a7f3821cd2c9355801ed8cd ("new
QByteArrayList class").
This class is coming back in Qt 5.4.
[ChangeLog][CHANGELOG FIX] Remove the line about QByteArrayList being
added.
Change-Id: I890ab2b34a9b3e575512eb306d0f241143a867cf
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@digia.com>
|
|
|
Initial submission of a new class QByteArrayList with the
purpose of aggregating and then joining QByteArray instances.
[ChangeLog][QtCore] Added new QByteArrayList class.
Change-Id: I2a9dc71ff7aadb19ebc129a0d47ac8cd33895924
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
