| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The ability to set a container to be unsharable has very little use and
it costs us an extra conditional for every refcount up and possibly
down.
This change is a no-op for current Qt 5. It shuffles a few things around
just so Qt can compile if you define QT_NO_UNSHARABLE_CONTAINERS. That
is done to ease the fixing of the code in Qt 6 and to make my life
easier: I'll keep that defined in my local Qt build so I can catch any
misuses of this deprecated API.
The newly deprecated methods are not marked QT_DEPRECATED because the
bootstrapped tools wouldn't build -- they're built with QT_NO_DEPRECATED
defined, which causes build errors.
[ChangeLog][QtCore] The setSharable() and isSharable() functions in Qt
containers has been deprecated and will be removed in Qt 6. New
applications should not use this feature, while old applications that
may be using this (undocumented) feature should port away from it.
Discussed-on: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-February/015724.html
Change-Id: I789771743dcaed6a43eccd99382f8b3ffa61e479
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This extends the QLinkedList auto test. This is copy paste
with small edits from the QList auto test.
Change-Id: I5bce7ee304998d1c7258f11b2f31a7fb87706936
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before a call to erase on a shared instance would imply that the
item was inserted into the shared data (i.e all instances)
Change-Id: I655ccf04b1ad9bf82e6bfade58929538fa7df000
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
|
|
Before a call to erase on a shared instance would imply that the
item was removed from the shared data (i.e all instances)
This patch improves the behavior to detach and erase the item
specified by the iterator (i.e same behavior as QVector)
Change-Id: Ib3cfb5363c86b400886c80b75b0c20ca854ce801
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
|
