summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/auto/testlib/selftests/expected_globaldata.tap
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Fix the skip-check in TestMethods::invokeTest()Edward Welbourne2019-03-291-9/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TestMethods::invokeTest() has an outer loop on global data (albeit with a comment that said otherwise). On its first cycle, we run the test function's *_data() method, if it has one; there is an inner loop on the rows this created. If the *_data() QSKIP()s, we need to skip the whole test; otherwise, a QSKIP() in one sub-test should not lead to skipping the remaining sub-tests. Moved the check for *_data() QSKIP()ping to right after *_data() returns, inside the "first global cycle" block that runs it. Previously, this check was done before entering the loop on local data rows, but outside that "first global cycle" block: consequently, later global cycles would fall foul of this check (even though the *_data() hasn't been run in this cycle, much less QSKIP()ped in it) if the last sub-test of the previous global cycle had QSKIP()ped. When running a single test for one specific data row, if the test's *_data() QSKIP()ped, this misplaced check would also have lead to a misleading "Unknown testdata" warning. Changed testlib/selftests' tst_globaldata::skipSingle() to trigger the bug (by having its last local row of first global row skip, which caused the second global row to be omitted) to verify this is also fixed; and amended one of its comments to reflect what's now to be expected. Updated the test's expected output files. Task-number: QTBUG-61774 Change-Id: I99596b595c6d1184038f23383844c6ff51a0cd91 Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@qt.io>
* Tidy up tst_globaldata to use better namings and document what it testsEdward Welbourne2019-03-271-31/+31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | In particular, document the mis-behavior it takes for granted in one test. Renamed some variables so that they're visually distinct from one another and actually mean something intelligible. Renamed the sub-tests to say what's actually happening. Reading the test output now at least makes it possible to see what's wrong. I'll fix that in a later commit. Task-number: QTBUG-61774 Change-Id: I3e5f83b8baa3c6afbca9231b5bbc89d17f3e57e2 Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@qt.io>
* testlib: Add Test Anything Protocol (TAP) reporterTor Arne Vestbø2018-03-141-0/+52
The Test Anything Protocol (TAP), was originally Perl's simple text-based interface between testing modules and test harnesses, but has since been adopted by a large number of producers and consumers in many different languages, which allows colorizing and summarizing test results. The format is very simple: TAP version 13 ok 1 - test description not ok 2 - test description --- message: 'Failure message' severity: fail expected: 123 actual: 456 ... ok 3 - test description # SKIP 1..3 The specification [1] is very brief, so the implementation has been based on how typical consumers behave, especially when it comes to the undefined diagnostics block. [1] http://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html Change-Id: I616e802ea380165c678510e940ddc6607d39c92d Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>