| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It doesn't understand the arguments we usually pass to testlib.
Change-Id: Iea83d1d8c31a510b2bc442cbfc810eac631322e7
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Macros and the await helper function from qfunctions_winrt(_p).h are
needed in other Qt modules which use UWP APIs on desktop windows.
Task-number: QTBUG-84434
Change-Id: Ice09c11436ad151c17bdccd2c7defadd08c13925
Reviewed-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We use the Catch2 testing framework to test Qt Testlib, which also opens
up the possibility of using it for other internal testing once it's made
available through the build system.
The test now has a --rebase mode which will write out the actual results
as new expected files. Once we add the required post-processing to the
results to remove timestamps and other testrun-specific data we can
remove the standalone python script generate_expected_output.py that
today has to be kept in sync with the test itself.
No attempt has been made to clean up the comparison-functions, but
these could all benefit from moving their logic from the comparison
to the sanitization step. This will both make the expected files
more generic, and will reduce the diff once a failure occurs, since
we're not seeing all the hunks that the comparison-functions ignored.
Change-Id: I1769d42e7958d56d1ad5da958db0e8fe3a2a3c23
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
|
|
The use of a single subdirectory only for the test binary, but not the
actual source file, just made things harder to discover when looking
for the test code. Now all subdirectories are actual sub-tests.
Change-Id: Ia3e308ba8d231cc8ead1491b10a34801f76669b0
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
|
