From e6f7cc96fa09b50c17bc5f4645b06c30145a3f55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Volker Hilsheimer Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:07:45 +0200 Subject: Use C++11 alignof as reference for Q_ALIGNOF, and fix test on Android Not removing QT_EMULATED_ALIGNOF logic from qglobal.h at this point, as it might be used elsewhere. Change-Id: Ie78922bb604a54aed03ab5b88e31a7f29a3a4de0 Fixes: QTBUG-73561 Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira --- tests/auto/corelib/global/qglobal/tst_qglobal.cpp | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/auto/corelib/global/qglobal/tst_qglobal.cpp b/tests/auto/corelib/global/qglobal/tst_qglobal.cpp index 56da047147..7800a101ec 100644 --- a/tests/auto/corelib/global/qglobal/tst_qglobal.cpp +++ b/tests/auto/corelib/global/qglobal/tst_qglobal.cpp @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ typedef int (Empty::*memFun) (); QCOMPARE(Q_ALIGNOF(type), size_t(alignment)); \ /* Compare to native operator for compilers that support it, otherwise... erm... check consistency! :-) */ \ - QCOMPARE(QT_EMULATED_ALIGNOF(type), Q_ALIGNOF(type)); \ + QCOMPARE(alignof(type), Q_ALIGNOF(type)); \ } while (false) /**/ @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ void tst_QGlobal::qAlignOf() TEST_AlignOf_impl(AlignmentInStruct, Q_ALIGNOF(AlignmentInStruct)); // 32-bit x86 ABI, Clang disagrees with gcc -#if !defined(Q_PROCESSOR_X86_32) || !defined(Q_CC_CLANG) +#if !defined(Q_PROCESSOR_X86_32) || !defined(Q_CC_CLANG) || defined(Q_OS_ANDROID) TEST_AlignOf_impl(qint64 [5], Q_ALIGNOF(qint64)); #else TEST_AlignOf_impl(qint64 [5], Q_ALIGNOF(AlignmentInStruct)); -- cgit v1.2.3