From 4b1115742ac7be1a1c6bce0e9cac022adc0bdc5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:50:04 +0100
Subject: invert the logic of the c++98 default test

this is much more intuitive, and actually produces a sensible result
with configure -recheck after a compiler upgrade.

Change-Id: Icfa0b85377d9fc014e66490c8ebf6c9236df978e
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
---
 configure.json | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

(limited to 'configure.json')

diff --git a/configure.json b/configure.json
index 85ef23a186..0ff808519c 100644
--- a/configure.json
+++ b/configure.json
@@ -281,8 +281,8 @@
             "type": "compile",
             "test": "common/c++1z"
         },
-        "cxx98default": {
-            "label": "compiler defaulting to C++98",
+        "cxx11default": {
+            "label": "compiler defaulting to C++11 or higher",
             "type": "compile",
             "test": "common/c++98default"
         },
@@ -483,9 +483,9 @@
             "condition": "call.crossCompile",
             "output": [ "publicConfig", "privateConfig" ]
         },
-        "cxx98default": {
-            "label": "Compiler defaults to C++98",
-            "condition": "tests.cxx98default",
+        "cxx11default": {
+            "label": "Compiler defaults to C++11 or higher",
+            "condition": "!tests.cxx11default",
             "output": [ { "type": "publicConfig", "name": "c++11" } ]
         },
         "compiler-flags": {
-- 
cgit v1.2.3