From 1a84e55b8ffc2fee811e9dc61cce6faa3372e1ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Mutz Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 22:50:12 +0200 Subject: QtCore: replace uses of inefficient QLists with QVectors [itemmodels] These QPairs are larger than a void*, so holding them in QLists is needlessly inefficient. Worse, the code could come to depend on the fragile property of (inefficient) QLists that references to elements therein never are invalidated. Fix by holding them in QVector instead. Change-Id: Ie8d8eff3448ada7aef5dfba7fc701a59821f5b54 Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) --- src/corelib/itemmodels/qsortfilterproxymodel.cpp | 2 +- src/corelib/itemmodels/qstringlistmodel.cpp | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/corelib/itemmodels') diff --git a/src/corelib/itemmodels/qsortfilterproxymodel.cpp b/src/corelib/itemmodels/qsortfilterproxymodel.cpp index 184e340395..dc159c8f7c 100644 --- a/src/corelib/itemmodels/qsortfilterproxymodel.cpp +++ b/src/corelib/itemmodels/qsortfilterproxymodel.cpp @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ QT_BEGIN_NAMESPACE -typedef QList > QModelIndexPairList; +typedef QVector > QModelIndexPairList; static inline QSet qVectorToSet(const QVector &vector) { diff --git a/src/corelib/itemmodels/qstringlistmodel.cpp b/src/corelib/itemmodels/qstringlistmodel.cpp index 5f39fa60d7..e28348474c 100644 --- a/src/corelib/itemmodels/qstringlistmodel.cpp +++ b/src/corelib/itemmodels/qstringlistmodel.cpp @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ void QStringListModel::sort(int, Qt::SortOrder order) { emit layoutAboutToBeChanged(QList(), VerticalSortHint); - QList > list; + QVector > list; const int lstCount = lst.count(); list.reserve(lstCount); for (int i = 0; i < lstCount; ++i) -- cgit v1.2.3