From ece0c0a5e7e0b18beb58ccd868bde54c7be64f78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:46:58 +0100 Subject: Tidy nullptr usage Move away from using 0 as pointer literal. Done using clang-tidy. This is not complete as run-clang-tidy can't handle all of qtbase in one go. Change-Id: I1076a21f32aac0dab078af6f175f7508145eece0 Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll --- src/corelib/thread/qorderedmutexlocker_p.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/corelib/thread/qorderedmutexlocker_p.h') diff --git a/src/corelib/thread/qorderedmutexlocker_p.h b/src/corelib/thread/qorderedmutexlocker_p.h index 570c526225..83edfd5879 100644 --- a/src/corelib/thread/qorderedmutexlocker_p.h +++ b/src/corelib/thread/qorderedmutexlocker_p.h @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ class QOrderedMutexLocker public: QOrderedMutexLocker(QBasicMutex *m1, QBasicMutex *m2) : mtx1((m1 == m2) ? m1 : (std::less()(m1, m2) ? m1 : m2)), - mtx2((m1 == m2) ? 0 : (std::less()(m1, m2) ? m2 : m1)), + mtx2((m1 == m2) ? nullptr : (std::less()(m1, m2) ? m2 : m1)), locked(false) { relock(); -- cgit v1.2.3