From 87973325f1b99f2b25a5a0224e623803872ce2ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 16:23:25 +0200
Subject: Handle even more include in enum cases

The solution in d3ed7dac8aa2f4ede0c409254b9dd44842086be0 was needlessly
complicated, and broke a valid use case.
The issue of no identifier being available to parse after the include
has been processed can instead be solved by moving the test for the
closing brace after the include processing.

Fixes: QTBUG-94790
Pick-to: 6.2 6.1 5.15
Change-Id: Ieec4b89e1d117637f11479e8bddc4060f93da43d
Reviewed-by: Andrei Golubev <andrei.golubev@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
---
 src/tools/moc/moc.cpp | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/tools/moc')

diff --git a/src/tools/moc/moc.cpp b/src/tools/moc/moc.cpp
index d57e43b59d..56440129c2 100644
--- a/src/tools/moc/moc.cpp
+++ b/src/tools/moc/moc.cpp
@@ -285,10 +285,9 @@ bool Moc::parseEnum(EnumDef *def)
             return IncludeState::NoInclude;
     };
     do {
+        handleInclude();
         if (lookup() == RBRACE) // accept trailing comma
             break;
-        if ( handleInclude() == IncludeState::IncludeEnd)
-            continue;
         next(IDENTIFIER);
         def->values += lexem();
         handleInclude();
-- 
cgit v1.2.3