From 586adeabe4d58a7c8a71bbb1be79c3533ab858ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@digia.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:09:56 +0100
Subject: add and use qtHaveModule() function

this is much more elegant than the so far propagated !isEmpty(QT.foo.name).
also replace feature-specific tests (no-gui and no-widgets) and the
obsolete contains(QT_CONFIG, foo) syntax.

Change-Id: Ia4b3c8febcabf9eeca67b1f9173a523820b1038b
Reviewed-by: Sergio Ahumada <sergio.ahumada@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tasuku Suzuki <stasuku@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@digia.com>
---
 tests/benchmarks/gui/gui.pro | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'tests/benchmarks/gui/gui.pro')

diff --git a/tests/benchmarks/gui/gui.pro b/tests/benchmarks/gui/gui.pro
index f4b84f0428..e943347938 100644
--- a/tests/benchmarks/gui/gui.pro
+++ b/tests/benchmarks/gui/gui.pro
@@ -17,5 +17,5 @@ TRUSTED_BENCHMARKS += \
 
 include(../trusted-benchmarks.pri)
 
-isEmpty(QT.widgets.name): SUBDIRS -= \
+!qtHaveModule(widgets): SUBDIRS -= \
     itemviews
-- 
cgit v1.2.3