use nullptr consistently (clang-tidy)

From now on we prefer nullptr instead of 0 to clarify cases where
we are assigning or testing a pointer rather than a numeric zero.

Also, replaced cases where 0 was passed as Qt::KeyboardModifiers
with Qt::NoModifier (clang-tidy replaced them with nullptr, which
waas wrong, so it was just as well to make the tests more readable
rather than to revert those lines).

Change-Id: I4735d35e4d9f42db5216862ce091429eadc6e65d
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/tests/auto/qml/qqmlitemmodels/tst_qqmlitemmodels.cpp b/tests/auto/qml/qqmlitemmodels/tst_qqmlitemmodels.cpp
index fca72ab021..cbb7ebb0ff 100644
--- a/tests/auto/qml/qqmlitemmodels/tst_qqmlitemmodels.cpp
+++ b/tests/auto/qml/qqmlitemmodels/tst_qqmlitemmodels.cpp
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ void tst_qqmlitemmodels::itemSelection()
     QCOMPARE(object->property("count").toInt(), 5);
     QCOMPARE(object->property("contains").toBool(), true);
 
-    const char *propNames[] = { "itemSelectionRead", "itemSelectionBinding", 0 };
+    const char *propNames[] = { "itemSelectionRead", "itemSelectionBinding", nullptr };
     for (const char **name = propNames; *name; name++) {
         QVariant isVariant = object->property(*name);
         QCOMPARE(isVariant.userType(), qMetaTypeId<QItemSelection>());
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ void tst_qqmlitemmodels::modelIndexList()
     QModelIndexList someMIL = object->someModelIndexList();
     QCOMPARE(cppMILVariant.value<QModelIndexList>(), someMIL);
 
-    const char *propNames[] = { "modelIndexListRead", "modelIndexListBinding", 0 };
+    const char *propNames[] = { "modelIndexListRead", "modelIndexListBinding", nullptr };
     for (const char **name = propNames; *name; name++) {
         QVariant milVariant = object->property(*name);
         QCOMPARE(milVariant.userType(), qMetaTypeId<QModelIndexList>());