1 files changed, 34 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/auto/qml/qqmlvaluetypes/tst_qqmlvaluetypes.cpp b/tests/auto/qml/qqmlvaluetypes/tst_qqmlvaluetypes.cpp
index 300f5b90e5..0d9a561378 100644
--- a/tests/auto/qml/qqmlvaluetypes/tst_qqmlvaluetypes.cpp
+++ b/tests/auto/qml/qqmlvaluetypes/tst_qqmlvaluetypes.cpp
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ private slots:
     void customValueTypeInQml();
     void gadgetInheritance();
     void toStringConversion();
+    void enumProperties();
 
 private:
     QQmlEngine engine;
@@ -1649,6 +1650,39 @@ void tst_qqmlvaluetypes::toStringConversion()
     QCOMPARE(stringConversion.toString(), StringLessGadget_to_QString(g));
 }
 
+struct GadgetWithEnum
+{
+    Q_GADGET
+public:
+
+    enum MyEnum { FirstValue, SecondValue };
+
+    Q_ENUM(MyEnum)
+    Q_PROPERTY(MyEnum enumProperty READ enumProperty)
+
+    MyEnum enumProperty() const { return SecondValue; }
+};
+
+void tst_qqmlvaluetypes::enumProperties()
+{
+    QJSEngine engine;
+
+    // When creating the property cache for the gadget when MyEnum is _not_ a registered
+    // meta-type, then QMetaProperty::type() will return QMetaType::Int and consequently
+    // property-read meta-calls will return an int (as expected in this test). However if we
+    // explicitly register the gadget, then QMetaProperty::type() will return the user-type
+    // and QQmlValueTypeWrapper should still handle that and return an integer/number for the
+    // enum property when it is read.
+    qRegisterMetaType<GadgetWithEnum::MyEnum>();
+
+    GadgetWithEnum g;
+    QJSValue value = engine.toScriptValue(g);
+
+    QJSValue enumValue = value.property("enumProperty");
+    QVERIFY(enumValue.isNumber());
+    QCOMPARE(enumValue.toInt(), int(g.enumProperty()));
+}
+
 
 QTEST_MAIN(tst_qqmlvaluetypes)