| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Store PointVelocityData by value in the QMap to avoid leaking memory.
This also appears to be slightly faster than heap allocation, with
the struct being relatively small (24 or 32 bytes depending on qreal).
Fixes: QTBUG-73182
Change-Id: Ibd9374746b76fd5b78c23283d278b6af42907c96
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In this scenario, a DragHandler is inside an Item in a Loader, under
a MouseArea, which unloads the loader on press. So on press, the
DragHandler acquires a passive grab, then the MouseArea acquires the
exclusive grab, then the DragHandler is destroyed along with its parent
when the Loader is unloaded. On release,
QQuickEventPoint::setGrabberItem(nullptr) was sending an
onGrabChanged(passiveGrabber, OverrideGrabPassive, this) notification.
That was questionable: the handler was not just then getting its grab
overridden, but rather un-overridden, because the exclusive grab
was being released. It's also a good idea to check for null pointers,
since m_passiveGrabbers is a collection of QPointers already,
so we can tell when a passive grabber is deleted dynamically.
It can also be reproduced with MultiPointTouchArea just as with
MouseArea, so the test is written that way for convenience, because
we have tst_multipointtoucharea_interop already. It doesn't really
matter which handler has the passive grab, or which item has the
exclusive grab that's being relinquished.
Fixes: QTBUG-73819
Change-Id: Ic605efa2143a1d849be095dcb88d6c38d7d2ee19
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So far it was checking parentContains() on press, release, or when
the gesturePolicy is WithinBounds, but not for each movement when the
policy is DragThreshold (the default). This might explain most of the
remaining warning noise: "pointId is missing from current event, but was
neither canceled nor released" because it was possible for TapHandler
to remember wanting a point that it should not have wanted, but without
taking any kind of grab, and then complaining when that point was no
longer present. Since it did not grab, it did not get the release,
unless the release was part of an event containing a point that it
DID grab.
Fixes: QTBUG-71887
Change-Id: I26ce62279574cf6b0150f24e486f224a604ac6b1
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
src/plugins/qmltooling/packetprotocol/qpacketprotocol.cpp
src/quick/handlers/qquickhandlerpoint.cpp
src/quick/handlers/qquicksinglepointhandler.cpp
tests/auto/qml/ecmascripttests/test262
Change-Id: I8908ec8c6116ca626fbd269af7625d4c429429ca
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Task-number: QTBUG-68933
Change-Id: Ibb5aa227e82825085e7214e17dcffcb17fd44157
Reviewed-by: Topi Reiniö <topi.reinio@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This just simplifies the code a little, and also enables event
filtering during delivery to Items.
Change-Id: I407dc9a19207f977b574f2a92f5da892e8752987
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We'll use this for delivery of QWheelEvents to both Items and
Pointer Handlers. Later we can perhaps use it for QScrollEvent too.
Task-number: QTBUG-68119
Change-Id: I04cbbc85fe1a86cf5fd0374d353876f7e6140b70
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
For now we already have QQuickPointerNativeGestureEvent; and in the
future, there may be other single-point events such as wheel events.
It's handy to reuse the implementations of several virtual
functions and the m_point storage.
Also format braces more consistently in function implementations.
Change-Id: I4b514610b9ed2bd23b7e9a6f1acf826ebd9ebc45
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a Pointer Handler is used in an item view delegate, it can hold a
passive grab at the time it is destroyed, in which case the QPointer
will be set to null.
Change-Id: I18d9da36b95a22de327913b3a296bdbea1d7bb1a
Reviewed-by: David Edmundson <davidedmundson@kde.org>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Calling grabberItem() to get the old grabber must come before setting
m_exclusiveGrabber. Then we call oldGrabberItem->touchUngrabEvent()
or oldGrabberItem->mouseUngrabEvent() as appropriate. Now the
responsibility for this is moved from QQuickItem::grabMouse()
to QQuickEventPoint::setGrabberItem() (which it calls).
Task-number: QTBUG-65648
Change-Id: Ia6219cb798d7f671ccc4006d51eeb87dbdbda3ef
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: Id2fb6419be9a35ddaa24106d3022e72070cb908d
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
QQuickPointerTouchEvent::m_event is 0 when calling
QQuickPointerTouchEvent::isPressEvent(). Add a convenience function
with a check returning the Qt::TouchPointStates.
Task-number: QTBUG-44976
Change-Id: I2433ec3c56adeda2de190ca46aed8413a1357c55
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It was a bug that we made a local QQuickPointerDevice::Capabilities
instance and didn't pass it to the QQuickPointerDevice constructor.
Further, we've now reserved the entire lower byte for storing
QTouchDevice::capabilities, and the upper byte for storing QtQuick-
specific capabilities, so we can copy the whole lower byte instead
of just the lower nybble.
Change-Id: Ia21b6a1503ea870a1e16cebe70a20f4e21903054
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This update corrects many qdoc warnings, mostly of the "Can't link to..."
variety, but there were also a few qdoc comments added. As of this update,
the qdoc warning count is 46 in QtDeclarative.
Change-Id: Icf2d34c7ce7010ebfd9b474feacfe8af42f3fd5f
Reviewed-by: Martin Smith <martin.smith@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This update corrects several QML property links. Currently, the best
way to link to a QML property is like this:
\l {QtQuick::EventPoint::velocity} {velocity}
In other words, use the full path to the property as the link, using
'::' as the separator, and use the property name as the label. Enclose
both the link and the label in curly braces.
Change-Id: I19231403b82d41ad89096dd27787eff57c91b8ae
Reviewed-by: Martin Smith <martin.smith@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: Ifdf0b8cb43b1e88f3931f49ac6ca72019548ddcf
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to make sure of it, we have to do the permission check
in the legacy call chain too: QQuickFlickable::filterMouseEvent() ->
QQuickItem::grabMouse() -> QQuickWindowPrivate::setMouseGrabber() ->
QQuickEventPoint::setGrabberItem() ->
QQuickPointerHandler::approveGrabTransition()
Change-Id: Ice3499bc56e7c89fb43b054ddcd0098fea94ba2a
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As soon as we enable the concept that PointerHandlers can use passive
grabs to lurk, monitor all movements, and then steal the passive grab,
they can fight over the grab. For example if there are two items with
PinchHandlers, and two or more touches occur within bounds for both,
then each update event can cause the other PinchHandler to steal the
grabs and become active.
So we replace stealing with negotiation: the handler which wants to
take over the grab checks its own flags to see whether that's allowed,
and the handler which is about to lose its grab also has the right
to approve or deny the takeover (just as QQuickItem has had
keepMouseGrab and keepTouchGrab for a long time.) Additionally,
if one handler wants to cancel another handler's grab without
taking over (simply set the grabber to null), it must be approved.
A single-point handler can simply call setExclusiveGrab, with the
expectation that permission may be granted or denied. A multi-point
handler only wants to grab all points if grabbing all of them will
be allowed, otherwise grab none; so it calls canGrab on each point
to check beforehand. Thus, when two handlers are competing for the
same grabs, one or both can be prevented from stealing from each other,
or from Handlers in general, or from Items, or some combination.
Change-Id: I5c733b2b8995ce686da0be42244394eeee82a268
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
setGrabberPointerHandler is now implemented more similarly to
setGrabberItem. One improvement is that in
tests/manual/pointer/pinchDragFlingMPTA.qml the MPTA deactivates
when the PinchHandler takes over its touchpoint grabs.
Change-Id: I0bd4f143b5f25f1b393839f86c2a7802f1fa1886
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In 5.9 a typical filtering sequence would be
deliverPressEvent -> deliverMatchingPointsToItem -> QQuickWindow::sendEvent ->
sendFilteredMouseEvent -> Test::childMouseEventFilter, let's say it returns true;
then because the event is accepted, deliverMatchingPointsToItem grabs the mouse.
In 5.10, we rather do
deliverPressOrReleaseEvent -> sendFilteredPointerEvent -> sendFilteredPointerEventImpl ->
Test::childMouseEventFilter, which returns true; and in this case, setGrabberItem
was missing until now.
In case of touch rather than mouse, it grabs the touchpoints in this
kind of scenario.
Also made the failsafe more reliable to ensure that no grabs are retained
after release (after seeing that one failing autotest can cause failures
in subsequent tests).
Done-with: Jan-Arve Sæther
Task-number: QTBUG-62631
Task-number: QTBUG-62549
Task-number: QTBUG-62628
Change-Id: I16dafc9aa0de2fc163c524f7f5b109f82d7e84fd
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I6f581eec8df784878041ccdfc25dd3ebd1a02d70
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
macOS generates QNativeGestureEvents for 2-finger trackpad
zoom and rotation gestures. Now PinchHandler will react to them
in the same way that PinchArea does.
Change-Id: I4c7dab1d3561d20897e3671f4eb68d01ea06b9bd
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
also QQuickPointerEvent and QQuickPointerDevice
Change-Id: I8bdb7c26cf6a5775a77dbf748c47c170270c5fff
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For consistency we always spell it out, although it does make some
of these properties inconveniently verbose.
Change-Id: I64a08c3aa261c0ab89e09472dd47510abafbf7ca
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't seem to have any use for invalid points, so let's remove the concept.
The debug code first checks the valid property, but then unconditionally
accesses the event, showing that we never had any invalid event in there
in the first place.
Change-Id: I5f8aac16c519f06a151198902cc98097eafacaa8
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
182648 Dereference before null check
There may be a null pointer dereference, or else the comparison against
null is unnecessary.
In QQuickEventPoint::estimatedVelocity(): All paths that lead to this
null pointer comparison already dereference the pointer earlier
(CWE-476)
Coverity-Id: 182648
Change-Id: Ie8ca1a58b9c11f7c459d719ccd0a3f3fa9eaeea5
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
examples/quick/shared/LauncherList.qml
src/quick/items/qquickevents.cpp
src/quick/items/qquickevents_p_p.h
src/quick/items/qquickwindow.cpp
tests/auto/quick/touchmouse/tst_touchmouse.cpp
Change-Id: Id692d291455093fc72db61f1b854f3fc9190267b
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
c2ca2cbf04071ffb3aee6af8d5ab9084dfa1c091 started to restrict delivery of
items in childMouseEventFilter by checking that we wouldn't deliver
completely random points outside the item that were not grabbed by child
items. That is generally correct.
It did no longer send along touch points that had any other state but
pressed but were inside when they had no grabber. That part was wrong,
points must be sent along if they are not grabbed and inside the item.
Task-number: QTBUG-60368
Change-Id: Ida24f5d2310d3b71db79ae5f95da2c57dcd3f150
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The sequence of events delivered from a double click is:
[Press,Release,Press,DblClick,Release]
The problem was that a DblClick was delivered just like a press event, so
it would clear the passive grabber that was established because of the
former Press event.
When the Release event then got processed, there was therefore a risk that
the Release event was not delivered to the passive grabber.
The fix is to not deliver DblClick events at all to handlers, and to not
deliver DblClick to items if the former Press event was accepted by a
handler.
Change-Id: I49c0e32ef4e33f7b6014d35dc065da2527b94779
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The new rule is that when the number of touchpoints changes, we start
over with event delivery as if the touch had just begun, to give more
opportunities to hand off processing from one item or handler to
another. And MultiPointTouchArea can now handle the handoff:
for example in tests/manual/pointer/pinchDragFlingMPTA.qml when the
user is pressing three fingers, the PinchHandler is active; when the
user then lifts one finger, the MPTA can resume handling the two
remaining touchpoints as if they were just pressed.
The change in QQuickMultiPointerHandler::wantsPointerEvent is both
a behavior change and an optimization: released points aren't eligible;
but if some points are released, then pressed, updated and stationary
points are all eligible. And, figure this out without looping over the
points twice.
Change-Id: I26b7593de8e72b471adfec4a4482dd87a8288442
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
QQuickPointerEvent is a wrapper for a QInputEvent. Between event
deliveries, the object exists but it doesn't have a current event to
which to refer. qDebug() should still work OK anyway in that case.
Change-Id: I5aa9584c5d7988bb748befa90785efe8bd24678a
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It can help to distinguish the time period when we are still delivering
the same event.
Change-Id: Id738d3e210431f1803cad9ace000c0f702e930fc
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It was part of the intended design for pointer handlers; omitting this
feature has until now prevented some opportunities for handoff
from one handler to another.
Now if PinchHandler has grabbed, pressing one more point will let
something else have a chance again, for example.
But this is incomplete in that if we release a point, we should do
the same thing, actually.
Change-Id: I10f567e7e4388bf0caab54c261178f19db20b14a
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It's not just the grabbers we have to worry about. If touchpoints in
one event are in a different order than in the previous one, we need
to also preserve anything that was remembered from when that touchpoint
was pressed: that is pressTimestamp, scenePressPos, and maybe sceneGrabPos.
So now we use a vector of structs for that purpose, which is more
extensible and easier to read.
Change-Id: Ibf2c0079693ed10988f0066184d53ee9106f2eca
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If we have a TouchCancel event we send it to the Item via sendEvent,
so it can be detected in the Item's event() or touchEvent() override.
If not, it still needs to be informed that it lost the grab, so
call touchUngrabEvent() instead. MultiPointTouchArea for example
will stop showing that all its points are pressed, if the grab is
stolen by something else. Followup to
59c753bc75c7cfd4068fbbba3c25e1f54c46f4c0
Change-Id: I211c02d51cdde8f8722600cf914485adcc2aa1f3
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Revisions to 9b5fc80af28580e9672792dd511d876a93947882 and
781f76176239bfbfe6041f2676e2f2804337d312 are necessary to allow
Flickable to steal synth-mouse events from children which accept only
touch events.
Change-Id: Id779368d7a44c1561da99a9f2c37e8d32278773e
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|\|
| |
| |
| | |
Change-Id: Ie2894830470a69827d4ace3d8af9bee971e3fbd4
|
| |\
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Change-Id: Ib3d81ad33a6ba28d891da91271a64d5fcc4874e6
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Since moving to pointer events, we would deliver all events inside the
filter function. The expected behavior though is that only points that
are already grabbed, pressed inside or grabbed by children would be seen
by the filter function.
This broke using multiple touch aware items at the same time (2 pinch
areas for example).
Change-Id: I42a430f196ebbcf0a83a6dc8aca319e433ad52ad
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
These types are qreal, not int.
Change-Id: I26569c40825ce098ea095b3d9dc9b84eb3870c02
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Correction to 3b3c8103496f61ebc4b72e73035a4d43fcdd03b0: never set
m_exclusiveGrabber without setting m_grabberIsHandler at the same time,
otherwise a crash is possible when static_casting to the wrong type
and attempting to call methods on the item or handler.
Change-Id: I74e015b4fa2edb68cbd5c45bc3aaa6083eec7784
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The singlePointHandlerProperties manual test showed how this was broken
in a couple of ways after 8c659c6c723e4f5f97f46a4555a4765e85c26f1d :
- When QQuickPointerTouchEvent::reset() is swapping one point instance
for another, and consequently transferring the grabbers from one to
another, it should not cause onGrabChanged to occur. Every point
update was triggering DragHandler.onGrabChanged.
- The order of signal emission is important so that sceneGrabPos
will be correct in onGrabChanged.
Change-Id: I62a302d6e54126ae10834b6d622e82aa0e434bab
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Because touchpoints can be released in a different order than they
were pressed, and even the QPA plugins don't guarantee that points
in a QTouchEvent will always stay in the same order while they are
still pressed, we cannot assume that the order of points will not
change every time a touch update occurs. And QQuickPointerTouchEvent
has a vector m_touchPoints in which the current points come first:
if the first point in that vector is released, it will be reset() to
represent a different touchpoint with a different ID. So it follows
that QQuickEventPoint::reset doesn't have enough information to
decide when a change of pointId means an implicit ungrab; and this
code was just a failsafe anyway (thus the qWarning).
QQuickPointerTouchEvent::reset() is responsible for identifying
which grabs need to be retained in which points from one event to
the next, and also currently warns if a point was pressed while
still being grabbed from previous interactions.
However, a mouse event only has one point, and we rely on
QQuickEventPoint to retain the grabbers. Efficiency-wise it
doesn't make sense to clear m_exclusiveGrabber and m_passiveGrabbers
and then re-populate them each time the mouse moves.
Since the risk of reordered points is only for touch events,
clearing the grabbers is now done in QQuickEventTouchPoint::reset().
One manifestation of this bug was in multibuttons.qml: sometimes
pressing a second button would cause the first button to be released.
It turned out to occur whenever the touchpoints got reordered.
Change-Id: Ia641f619d763e1a1ea7b59c1e1d08bce9d88e707
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
and move more notification responsibility into QQuickEventPoint,
thus simplifying QQuickWindowPrivate::grabTouchPoints() which is the
implementation behind QQuickItem::grabTouchPoints.
It's important for QQuickEventPoint::setGrabberItem to
change local state first and then notify, to prevent recursive
notify/ungrab loops. MPTA for example does an ungrab
when it receives touchUngrabEvent, which then notifies again
if the first ungrab was not already fully completed.
Change-Id: I6f7b939c8cd76ac5f2d1ddda8b210fa3d31d619a
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Now that onGrabChanged() is unified, we have a means to tell the
handler when it loses its grab due to a touch event being canceled.
Change-Id: Idf3649242233ac7fb8c1fa80ad257ee14b861090
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
After change 8984c42d1779b13fd29d95274af2d01d32528e52 in qtbase, a
QTouchEvent::TouchPoint::id is already guaranteed to be unique across
devices. We therefore don't need a larger value space for
QQuickEventPoint::pointId, since that value is the same value as we got
from the QTouchEvent
Change-Id: I044630a812706f3c114bb28cffb29536f9feeeb3
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
If an Item gets exclusive grab, that replaces any existing PointerHandler's
exclusive grab, and overrides any passive grabbers as well.
Change-Id: I659137a08e7069c8e72ddbb1f27e16d4b19828b9
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
* localize -> localizePosition
* remove isValid and invalidate
* remove isDraggedOverThreshold
* remove Q_INVOKABLEs
Change-Id: I21f788beb1e86275a9b7a1f1014998b2569001d0
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
onGrabChanged and handleGrab looked redundant. It was also not clear
how important it is for handlers to react to passive ungrabs, overrides
or cancellations. Rather than debating about when to call one of these
and when not to, let's centralize the responsibility in
QQuickEventPoint (because the grabber pointers are stored there, so
it's the ultimate destination of any grab change), and let's notify
all the relevant handlers about all changes, with enough information
that each handler can decide for itself what's important and what
isn't. But so far most handlers don't need to override this virtual.
The base class QQuickPointerHandler takes care of setting the
active property to false, rejecting the eventpoint, and unsetting
keepMouseGrab and keepTouchGrab whenever grab is lost; and emitting
grabChanged or canceled as appropriate to notify any QML code which
needs to know. Subclasses mainly care about the change of active state:
they must initiate active state themselves, and may react when it
reverts to false.
Change-Id: I6c7f29472d12564d74ae091b0c81fa08fe131ce7
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Add documentation to the grab-related event and eventpoint methods.
Rename "grabber" functions which relate only to the exclusive grab,
in cases where it would otherwise be ambiguous.
And a few other documentation changes.
Change-Id: I1a203c8c06a19d4abdb000f08b387c38341ef476
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|