| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 5445fcac36d7122d533a2bdf0fcfe6206b7f3ff4.
The original commit avoids a warning generated for a dubious use case
and breaks controls2 in a non-trivial way as a side effect. We should
rather live with the warning.
Task-number: QTBUG-82368
Change-Id: I6197bb63036cb25ec3e88f549667519b8f3ff13a
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Setting a delegate item's parent to nullptr will make any
bindings to the parent inside the item invalid, and
warnings will as such be printed (first seen after
8c72e634b3b0eacbfdee883bfc34994d3c19ed77).
I assume the reason for setting the (visual) parent to nullptr
is to immediately hide it. So to avoid trigger any bindings, we
instead just cull if from the scene graph.
It's also dubious why a delegate should have bindings to
its parent in the first place, since what ends up being the
parent is an implementation detail, and probably not be the item
the user expects it to be.
Fixes: QTBUG-81976
Change-Id: I7bd8ab91461504b6e79d4aa2ab832be087245c3e
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Only QQmlDelegateModel has reused/pooled signals. So only
connect/disconnect to those signals when the assigned model
is of that type.
Fixes: QTBUG-81257
Change-Id: I52a39a98ac0f557ff57307572581dc6c7a05af92
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
src/quick/items/qquickitemview.cpp
Change-Id: Ib9faebdbef5eebb80f4e6aeb5b15b5df7494b157
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When visible items become invisible, ListView will try to cache
them and redisplay these items if necessary. However, we can't
cache items when changing to a new model, since the old one will
be deleted later
Fix by adding a flag to let ListView know we are clearing items
and prevent cache unnecessary items
Fixes: QTBUG-80203
Change-Id: I50dcd3f0586c93496b143bdad0e59751360501a8
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
|
|\|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
src/quick/items/qquickitemsmodule.cpp
src/quick/items/qquickitemview.cpp
Change-Id: I02191959a5023c4320f5487a7fb3a71f8711195f
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If a QVector has been modified from the outside, all its iterators are
invalid. Therefore, we need to do index-based iteration here.
Change-Id: I02b850daf6aadd8f8a81cc93b0d295e1170d7dd6
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Change-Id: Ib19365258269a01e203359e7dbe1207f14df3758
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
|\|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
src/qml/common/qv4compileddata_p.h
Change-Id: I1150c8cd0161f0e22137d383013751394ae64e18
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As the variable was manually set to -1 beforehand, we would never emit
the change signal, leaving bindings stale. However, simply removing the
assignment would lead to not triggering the signal when currentIndex was
0. So now we set it to -2, which cannot happen in any other place.
Note that QTBUG-64998 was already mostly fixed due to earlier changes
fixing the currentItem part, only currentIndex was still broken
Fixes: QTBUG-68232
Fixes: QTBUG-64998
Fixes: QTBUG-63422
Change-Id: I885e06f1e258e67c3368d017bf79bff760440863
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
|
|\|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
tests/auto/quick/qquicklistview/tst_qquicklistview.cpp
tests/auto/quick/qquicktableview/tst_qquicktableview.cpp
Change-Id: Ib46bc1c717cf524eea2fb3d876810c8d55747c91
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When moving an item from ObjectModel A to ObjectModel B, polishes are
scheduled for the respective ListViews in order: the ListView for A
first, and then the ListView for B. However, when it comes time to
do the actual polishing via updatePolish(), the list of items is
traversed backwards. This means that the following calls
var item = objectModelA.get(0)
objectModelA.remove(0, 1)
objectModelB.insert(0, item)
will result in updatePolish() being called for ListView B first, and
then ListView A. As a result of this, setCulled(false) will be called
by ListView B (since the item is now visible within it), followed by
ListView A calling setCulled(true) (since the item is now no longer in
it).
As there is no way for these models to know about each other (and it's
not feasible to store refcounts in QQuickItemPrivate::extraData, since
ObjectModel is in QtQml.Models, which can't know about QtQuick), this
patch makes ListView check if the item is parented to its contentItem
before culling it. This prevents it from hiding items which are no
longer shown in its view.
Change-Id: If50614ebc269fae875195bbc63c0c04dab237775
Fixes: QTBUG-67986
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch will implement delegate item recycling in
ListView. The API will be the same as used in TableView, except
that it will be off by default since the behavior of a delegate
that is reused is not compatible with legacy applications
which were not written with this in mind.
Most importantly:
- Component.onCompleted will only be called on a delegate the
first time it's created, and never when it's reused.
- Any user-declared properties in the delegate (that is, not
model roles, index, etc) will not be cleared or updated when an
item is reused. The application must do this manually upon
receiving the pooled or reused signal in the item.
[ChangeLog][ListView] ListView now has support for reusing delegate
items. This can be switched on by setting the reuseItems property of
ListView to true.
Task-number: QTBUG-80507
Change-Id: I68cc8300b050e4a1f89feebb1d31a2fd9189c793
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This implements Michael Brasser's suggestion in the bug report.
As there do not seem to be other bug reports related to the
fixupPosition change, this might already be enough.
Fixes: QTBUG-66163
Change-Id: Iee45621ff7081b280626f4a81dab9bd36a7ea6b7
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Change-Id: I06578422b4558feabf7a77426b01e77953ab60e2
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The position of the first item in the list of visualItems was used to
know how to layout the rest of the visual items.
However, this did not work if the first item was actually moved (e.g.
due to a DnD operation). We therefore store the position of the first
visual item after each time we arrange it, and use that as a basis on
where to start layouting from.
Task-number: QTBUG-78076
Change-Id: I837f5b7d61a13d98d23287685c6fd66817360906
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
|
|\|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
.qmake.conf
src/qml/common/qv4compileddata_p.h
src/qml/types/qqmlbind.cpp
tests/auto/qml/qqmlproperty/tst_qqmlproperty.cpp
Change-Id: I6a137907e63445f17a3d6181b832a6bd76135bb2
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* Rename firstVisibleItem() to firstItemInView() to reflect its
behavior, as the comment requested ;)
* Likewise, rename some related variables
Change-Id: I98e25d5d47a4acb56a2b4f2bd75bec062ff770ee
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
|
|\|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
src/plugins/scenegraph/openvg/qsgopenvgcontext.cpp
tests/auto/quick/qquickpathview/tst_qquickpathview.cpp
Change-Id: I117c8d62b21800329d1035021d312d9924f83a1b
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
QQuickListViewPrivate::fixup() seems to only do "fixup" if
moveReason != QQuickListViewPrivate::SetIndex
By default, moveReason is set to Other. In the snippet given in
QTBUG-77418, this is why the highlight was respected when resizing the
ListView initially. However, after the currentIndex was changed,
moveReason was changed to SetIndex. When we then resized the ListView, it
still had the value SetIndex, and would fail to "fixup" properly.
Since the ListView preferredHighlightBegin is bound to width, we should
set moveReason to Other in the property setters that are related to
highlight. This is then consistent with how setCurrentIndex() does it (it
similarly sets d->moveReason = QQuickItemViewPrivate::SetIndex;)
Change-Id: I7edf77fc977e8c7e3fc656ff5bb22b4dd01afbe4
Task-number: QTBUG-77418
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It looked a bit odd that the DelegateModel delegate property was not a
notifying property. Adding the delegateChanged signal makes it easier
to update the view when this happens. The previous approach of removing
all delegates and adding all new ones resulted in the view losing its
currentIndex and often scrolling to a different place. It's also nice
to reduce the number of d-> indirections by adding the
QQuickItemViewPrivate::applyDelegateChange() function, so that we just
need one indirection to call it, and then it updates all the internal
stuff in one place.
Done-with: Frederik Gladhorn
Done-with: Joni Poikelin
Fixes: QTBUG-63477
Change-Id: I2d17fd11ff4a2fcb20968a7182dd2c403abb715a
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Change-Id: I9b1cfefda23febfb24282bc30bc38865499ec2f4
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The view uses a visible items list, which is maintained by the refill()
method, to determine which items should be triggered to do the populate
transition. The refill() was only invoked when component completed
before doing the populate transition; but if the size of the view
depends on the size of window (for example, using anchors.fill), more
delegates could become visible after component completed. In such a
case, part of visible items were not be triggered to do the transition.
[ChangeLog][QtQuick][Item Views] Item views such as ListView now properly
populate delegates with a populate transition when the view is resized
after componentComplete.
Fixes: QTBUG-76487
Change-Id: Id90c3f73d9911c8a1d6d8b1ea0c51f6c27d0ed5b
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|\|
| |
| |
| | |
Change-Id: I59343fe228ca6b823b61577e5a0907e7381899c2
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The refill() method would bail out early on an empty model. Make sure
that it at least updates the header and footer in such situations.
Fixes: QTBUG-31677
Change-Id: I1f3a1848ff263a8f7f9ccfc3b20f16b61348f57b
Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The cause was that fast flicking kicked items in and out of viewport,
while in transition, they would abruptly having tracking data structure
, i.e. releasePendingTransition of QQuickItemViewPrivate, got iterator
invalidated. This also helps to resolve QTBUG-44308.
Fixes: QTBUG-76433
Fixes: QTBUG-44308
Change-Id: If14533d3f6b1acd7b6ca0c5c723347c0cb3f54dc
Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@qt.io>
|
|\|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
.qmake.conf
src/imports/sharedimage/qsharedimageloader.cpp
src/quick/items/qquickitemviewfxitem_p_p.h
Change-Id: I12ce7c32788f4a394188a934e689b4ebac78138b
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The root cause was that the QAbstractAnimationJob::finished() might delegate its
destruction to change.listener->animationFinished(this), and the original author
was aware of that and provided a RETURN_IF_DELETE macro to return early if itself
got deleted. In the bug's case, change.listener->animationFinished(this)
dispatched to QQuickItemViewPrivate::animationFinished() which called
QQuickItemViewPrivate::release() and deleted the QAbstractAnimationJob object
itself in the end.
However, any objects derived from QAbstractAnimationJob, or holding a pointer
to a QAbstractAnimationJob, may potentially fall into the code path calling
QAbstractAnimationJob::finished(). Any QAnimationJobChangeListener that directly
or indirectly deletes QAbstractAnimationJob should be very suspicious to this
kind of "heap-use-after-free" bug. Should ensure that the QAbstractAnimationJob
won't be referenced after deletion.
In the bug's case, within the code path triggered by ListView displacement
animation, the other affected classes by QAbstractAnimationJob are:
QQuickItemViewFxItem, QQuickItemViewTransitionableItem, QQuickTransitionManager.
To fix this, a new SelfDeletable class is factored out to simplify the self-deletion
test logic. Any affected classes are made to have a public member m_selfDeletable.
Any code paths that finally reach QAbstractAnimationJob::finished() are
wrapped with related util macro.
Change-Id: Idd33fc3f2d529fd7d8bb088c329101b1e70dd6c0
Task-number: QTBUG-44308
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Ensure we stop FXViewItems from tracking so we don't have pointers
to dead QQuickListViewPrivate object on QQuickItem destruction.
Fixes: QTBUG-71581
Change-Id: I80291086697b1455d9319969fe5cba0ea4d04a73
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds itemAtIndex method to ItemView-derived views and
to PathView.
[ChangeLog][QtQuick][QQuickItemView] Added itemAtIndex() to
GridView, ListView and PathView to fetch a visible delegate by index.
Change-Id: Id8475d06c1481036984fe5109bb52cf2729b1c21
Fixes: QTBUG-72961
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While the view is flicking, if the content is updated by
a model reset, it gets very confused and creates many delegates
that won't be shown inside the visible area.
Now we cancel any active flicking before the model reset is handled.
Fixes: QTBUG-70742
Change-Id: I6f7aa368b760a00d08c540f3963c32e1e174a908
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When the velocity timeline is driving movement and simultaneously
someone calls positionViewAtIndex(), it gets very confused and goes
on creating and destroying delegates for a very long time. So now we
cancel the flicking animation immediately when calling any of the
positionViewAt* invokables.
Fixes: QTBUG-70941
Change-Id: I85e09344e79356b877a57ab634f72be1d7f93fca
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Moving the viewport in the middle of a layout operation is a bad idea as
it causes the visible items to change.
Task-number: QTBUG-49224
Change-Id: I45a214560e00b65ed53b9385e7a539bb4304b7d9
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FxItemViews wraps the QQuickItems used in QQuickItemView with
additional item view information, like transition status.
This patch will factor out FxItemView so that it can be reused
in the coming QQuickTable as well.
Change-Id: I5544b177d0ff28b2cbb76f33343808d953ec47bd
Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From now on we prefer nullptr instead of 0 to clarify cases where
we are assigning or testing a pointer rather than a numeric zero.
Also, replaced cases where 0 was passed as Qt::KeyboardModifiers
with Qt::NoModifier (clang-tidy replaced them with nullptr, which
waas wrong, so it was just as well to make the tests more readable
rather than to revert those lines).
Change-Id: I4735d35e4d9f42db5216862ce091429eadc6e65d
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There were some cases where the signal wasn't emitted and we ended up
with events being delivered to objects that didn't exist anymore.
Task-number: QTBUG-65881
Change-Id: I847669a978e82a0332907b029a8295bb993d2850
Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use the previous item view boundaries (before a remove was applied)
when defining transition properties.
Task-number: QTBUG-64311
Change-Id: I66870a7267ac26ea430c364383f32fd5c47d4a5d
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Generally the bufferedChanges are an "extension" of the currentChanges,
which can just not be applied at the moment because we are in a layout
phase. If we regenerate or clear the whole view in the mean time, the
bufferedChanges become just as invalid as the currentChanges.
On top of that, refilling can trigger further changes, part of which
will be applied during the refilling. As that leaves us in an
inconsistent state, we need to loop the refilling until no further
changes are generated. As the changes might affect items that are
already visible, and therefore not subject to refilling, we need to
clear all the items before refilling in this case.
In QTBUG-46488 things are added in the onCompleted callback of the
delegates (by expanding the tree view, which translates into adding
rows to the list view). Depending on where you add the new items, the
list view might pick them up when iterating the model on refill() or
it might create delegates for the same model entry twice. So, if that
happens we need to discard the result and refill again.
Task-number: QTBUG-46488
Change-Id: Ie4e0a731f7feda6aa962b6cb9a6cd5c3bf90486e
Reviewed-by: Richard Moe Gustavsen <richard.gustavsen@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'requestedIndex'
We used to assign the currently incubating item to 'requestedIndex' based
on requested incubation mode alone. This is not sufficient, as the item
can also be loaded async when the mode is AsyncIfNested. To check if the
item is really loading async (and that we're not getting nullptr because
of some other failure), we need to ask the incubator.
Task-number: QTBUG-61537
Change-Id: Id1f458db4a7584a6b58d5bad0e7832ce4fc341dc
Reviewed-by: J-P Nurmi <jpnurmi@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
specify incubation mode
The current implementation would pass a boolean to signal if asynchronous
or synchronous incubation should be used to create an item. The problem with this approach
is that passing 'synchronous" would translate to QQmlIncubation::AsynchronousIfNested
later down the chain. This meant that even if the caller requested synchronous incubation, it
could end up with asynchronous incubation anyway, e.g if an async parent incubator was active at
the time of the call. And this can easily come as an unhandled supprise for the caller, and as
such, cause unforseen bugs.
This patch is a first of a set of patches that is done to fix the bug reported in the task below.
It will not change any behavior, it is written to preserve the logic exactly as it were, just
as a preparation for subsequent patches. It makes it explicit at the call location what
incubation mode will be used, and especially make it clear whenever the AsynchronousIfNested
flag is in play.
Task-number: QTBUG-61537
Change-Id: I8b3ba5438ebb2cd59983a098bd8ceeeb844da87b
Reviewed-by: J-P Nurmi <jpnurmi@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sticky headers and footers weren't accounted for when calculating new
view position causing the requested item to be left behind them.
Task-number: QTBUG-63974
Change-Id: Id69579643a942e8558960b2c8b0fee980fa86947
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Index based scrolling does not enable moving and flicking properties.
Task-number: QTBUG-34576
Change-Id: Ief06d37115ca389027670c97ce6c0457a74d4872
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The animation was not being performed if the delayRemove attached
property was changed by the handler of the remove() attached signal.
We need to run the delayed transitions not only if we have an animation
for the target item, but also if we have an animation for the items
being displaced.
(The flag variables can safely be obtained outside of the for loop,
given that their value should not change during the loop iteration)
Task-number: QTBUG-57225
Change-Id: I8c138677d7dcdf63e0932ec5cf7738c0caeb2ab8
Reviewed-by: J-P Nurmi <jpnurmi@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In QQuickItemViewPrivate::applyModelChanges(), if
moveReason = QQuickItemViewPrivate::Other,
then QQuickItemView::trackedPositionChanged() will fail to call
d->setPosition(pos), which is normally what keeps the Flickable
moving for a while. Leave the reason as-is (it will be SetIndex in
this case), so as not to forget that we were actually trying to move
down. Updating the model was just a side-effect of that: either
because some QML code was trying to append to the model or because
fetchMore() was called.
Task-number: QTBUG-61269
Task-number: QTBUG-62864
Change-Id: I3fd402469950d6c12e6a8d6e42be83ea4f54776a
Reviewed-by: J-P Nurmi <jpnurmi@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If all the items currently in the view are being removed,
lastVisibleIndex will be -1. This caused an unwanted repositioning
of all the deleted items, which got moved to a wrong location.
Therefore, when all visible items are removed, we should avoid
recomputing any item's position.
Task-number: QTBUG-57225
Change-Id: I9909748a9cccb5e6a3726306e250921ce69fcba9
Reviewed-by: J-P Nurmi <jpnurmi@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When fixupPosition is called for a ListView with StrictlyEnforceRange,
the original reason for the move is lost, and the fixup is applied
immediately. There are already checks for whether the view is moving,
so expand these checks to include movement caused by highlight.
Change-Id: I25f771b9a529d31dc28acb9f91fcd2b582428200
Task-number: QTBUG-33568
Reviewed-by: Robin Burchell <robin.burchell@crimson.no>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Calling releaseItem() destroys the item, which emits childrenChanged
for the contentItem, and if at that point anything calls setFooMargin(),
setContentHeight(), returnToBounds(), or many other methods that
indirectly access the visibleItems list, it leads to a crash due to
read after free. Add a releaseVisibleItems() helper method that makes
a copy, clears the original list first, and then releases the items.
Task-number: QTBUG-48394
Task-number: QTBUG-61294
Change-Id: I29e4d3870d33549e8bf789de84c67ab1826fca7d
Reviewed-by: Robin Burchell <robin.burchell@crimson.no>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I84e363d735b443cb9beefffd14b8c023a37aa489
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: Ief706dfce0c81351ac06b8791267107ad8165974
Reviewed-by: Robin Burchell <robin.burchell@crimson.no>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that qmlInfo actually reports info messages, we want to change
existing callers to use warning-level messages to preserve the original
message level.
This was done through:
perl -p -i -e "s/qmlInfo\(/qmlWarning\(/" **/*.{cpp,h,qdoc}
.. with a little care taken to only add the hunks that should be changed.
Change-Id: I511cee11ce0a26ec1048cd2b84c7536b812a0d89
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
|