| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
qttest_p4.prf was added as a convenience for Qt's own autotests in Qt4.
It enables various crufty undocumented magic, of dubious value.
Stop using it, and explicitly enable the things from it which we want.
Since QT+= had to be touched already, this change also removes a lot of
useless duplication on those lines.
Change-Id: I9f2f20eaf4a0e676beddf474c7db8680e4712f78
Reviewed-on: http://codereview.qt-project.org/6302
Sanity-Review: Qt Sanity Bot <qt_sanity_bot@ovi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason McDonald <jason.mcdonald@nokia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One potential problem is that in certain circumstances the recycling
data list is so efficient that it doesn't need to use all particle data
in the list. In those cases, the uninitialized members were causing test
failures but these slight differences are acceptable for the simulation.
The ParticleSystem test is extended to check that it's only small edge
cases.
Change-Id: I5e2f133dc4b96dd05d49e7e983ae630e379fa66a
Reviewed-on: http://codereview.qt-project.org/6312
Sanity-Review: Qt Sanity Bot <qt_sanity_bot@ovi.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Jones <martin.jones@nokia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Particle System tests appear to be unstable when run in CI. They should
not have their results counted until this issue is resolved.
Task-number: QTBUG-21867
Change-Id: Ib6a7cd6a48f96bdb1558a1061e0952f583bbcd91
Reviewed-on: http://codereview.qt-project.org/6106
Reviewed-by: Qt Sanity Bot <qt_sanity_bot@ovi.com>
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I1b508756ffca6a05d495c52d84f46fcaeafe8797
Reviewed-on: http://codereview.qt-project.org/5947
Reviewed-by: Qt Sanity Bot <qt_sanity_bot@ovi.com>
Reviewed-by: Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern@nokia.com>
|
|
Just some basic autotests for most of the elements.
Change-Id: I2d289f38f362a38c69e03ff92154c98db3c4c486
Reviewed-on: http://codereview.qt-project.org/5844
Reviewed-by: Qt Sanity Bot <qt_sanity_bot@ovi.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Jones <martin.jones@nokia.com>
|