| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Task-number: QTBUG-75224
Change-Id: Ic7daefa2f0422a0b1cfa112fd5412cafffb2a9ed
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
touchAndDragHandlerOnFlickable and touchDragFlickableBehindSlider are
unstable.
Task-number: QTBUG-73983
Change-Id: I220869a0a6e7beb69d7273b0edc66ac067ebcd38
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The usual problem is that Flickable doesn't instantly jump to the
expected position but moves there after a delay.
Change-Id: Iafc9dd493b97629377e7f7c60ae7adde13427bae
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So far it was checking parentContains() on press, release, or when
the gesturePolicy is WithinBounds, but not for each movement when the
policy is DragThreshold (the default). This might explain most of the
remaining warning noise: "pointId is missing from current event, but was
neither canceled nor released" because it was possible for TapHandler
to remember wanting a point that it should not have wanted, but without
taking any kind of grab, and then complaining when that point was no
longer present. Since it did not grab, it did not get the release,
unless the release was part of an event containing a point that it
DID grab.
Fixes: QTBUG-71887
Change-Id: I26ce62279574cf6b0150f24e486f224a604ac6b1
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
QQuickItemPrivate::data_append() was not invoked when any kind of
Pointer Handler was directly declared in a Flickable (or subclass)
because QQuickFlickable redefines the default property to be its own
flickableData property. So we need to repeat the special handling
in QQuickFlickablePrivate::data_append() too. The handler must
be added to the private->extra->pointerHandlers vector, so that
QQuickItemPrivate::handlePointerEvent() will attempt to deliver
events to those handlers.
TapHandler seems OK (especially with its default gesturePolicy
so that it does not do an exclusive grab).
PointHandler seems OK.
DragHandler competes with Flickable for the exclusive grab.
pressDelay can help; or set acceptedDevices: PointerDevice.Mouse
to allow the mouse to drag but not flick, and the touchscreen
to flick but not drag.
Fixes: QTBUG-71918
Fixes: QTBUG-73035
Change-Id: Icb97ed5230abe0cb6ec0230b5b5759a0528df7e8
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Until now, AA_SynthesizeMouseForUnhandledTouchEvents has only affected
behavior of QGuiApplicationPrivate::processTouchEvent, but had no
effect in Qt Quick. QQuickWindow also accepts the touch event
just to make sure that QGuiApplication will not synthesize mouse
from touch, because it would be redundant: QQuickWindow does that
for itself.
Now we make it have an effect in Qt Quick too: skip mouse synthesis
if it is set to false. This provides a way to simplify the
event delivery. If you set it false, then you cannot manipulate old
mouse-only items like MouseArea and Flickable on a touchscreen.
(You can of course use event handlers for that.)
[ChangeLog][QtQuick][QQuickWindow] You can now disable touch->mouse
event synthesis in QtQuick by calling
qGuiApp.setAttribute(Qt::AA_SynthesizeMouseForUnhandledTouchEvents, false);
This will simplify and speed up event delivery, and it will also prevent
any and all interaction with mouse-only items like MouseArea and
Flickable on a touchscreen.
Task-number: QTBUG-52748
Change-Id: I71f1731b5abaeabd9dbce1112cd23bc97d24c12a
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't slow down CI for logging unless the test fails.
Change-Id: I2d5faedf3fadb30ec5a732445d695bda7e290233
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is important in order for passive grabbers to be in the same order
as if the points were pressed at the same time.
In our case, the problem occurred when we had a single-point DragHandler
together with a two-finger PinchHandler:
* One finger was pressed and moved
=> DragHandler called setPassiveGrab()
=> point0->passiveGrabbers: [DragHandler]
* A second finger was pressed and moved
=> PinchHandler called setPassiveGrab() for both points
=> point0->passiveGrabbers: [DragHandler,PinchHandler]
=> point1->passiveGrabbers: [PinchHandler]
So then as one keeps on dragging the *two* fingers, the DragHandler will
get the chance to do an exclusive grab first, (since its the first listed
passive grabber of point0), and the PinchHandler won't get the opportunity
to grab. This is not expected since their declaration order implies that
the PinchHandler should get a chance to grab first.
Change-Id: I4e82ed186eeb5bf1dae1679d393e5563072175d1
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
That is, minimumPointCount can now be set to a value > 1 to require
multiple fingers to do the dragging, or to track the displacement
of multiple fingers to adjust some value (such as the tilt of a map).
Task-number: QTBUG-68106
Change-Id: Ib35823e36deb81c8b277d3070fcc758c7c019564
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
... and clean up imports in examples, snippets and tests accordingly.
Change-Id: I5bbe63afd2614cdc2c1ec7d179c9acd6bc03b167
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When there's a DragHandler on one Item and a TapHandler on another,
we have more trouble with Flickable stealing the grab. We need a
test to ensure that this problem doesn't reappear after fixing.
Task-number: QTBUG-64846
Change-Id: Ia3bc3b7c9654f09aa96ad70968d82b566686e030
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We need Handlers to receive accurate positions for stationary touch
points: that is, the last-known position from the previous touch
event. (And we hope that all actual touch-capable platforms also send
proper QPA events with correct positions for stationary points.
We assert that it's a bug if they don't.)
As explained in qtbase 7cef4b6463fdb73ff602ade64b222333dd23e46c, it's
OK to retain a copy of a QTest::QTouchEventSequence for this purpose,
so that the QMap<int, QTouchEvent::TouchPoint> previousPoints will not
be discarded between events.
We have done this in other tests, but not consistently; e.g.
468626e99a90d6ac21cb311cde05c658ccb3b781 fixed the PinchArea test.
Change-Id: I4dbe69f8dcc4b1cca30fd7ce91d7d2ecf5ec4bc3
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It was too hard to debug behavior in this test.
Change-Id: Iaec9534cca17bdd90b94cfa8fa8b21b7026839ae
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
..while its (ancestor) coordinate system has changed during the drag.
For example, ensure that a DragHandler-based Slider keeps its knob centered.
If the Slider is used on a Flickable which you are flicking with a second
finger, then the coordinate system is changing underneath the Slider.
The problem was that DragHandler stored the initial drag position of the
target when the target item was pressed, and used that throughout the
whole drag operation. Unfortunately if the target item was inside a
Flickable that got flicked during a drag operation, that initial position
was not updated (and thus, incorrect).
Instead of storing the initial target position in scene coordinates, we
now store the position that got pressed in local target coordinates, and
ensure that in any further updates the touchpoint have the same local
position (by moving the target).
Task-number: QTBUG-64852
Change-Id: I25012d34d88f45c7eb9c711db0037d530cf10854
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Change-Id: I64bf7d183bbd8af7282270097809d14a54ba0188
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This got regressed by change e6d4df156e9aec62054740dc99ab8ba2855eaafc. Before
that change, we always cleared both the exclusive and passive grabbers.
Task-number: QTBUG-66152
Change-Id: I93d2568bd2a23ddd55a5294d544f978a50a5543e
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make sure the Rectangles we're sending the touch events to are
visible on screen, otherwise I get consistent failures in this
test on Linux.
Change-Id: Icc2ba7ba73c434dd2ef725adbaa57ab6d413f354
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: Ib1fe267c23ea9fce9bcc0a91ed61081260338460
Reviewed-by: Liang Qi <liang.qi@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If an item that had a TapHandler and a DragHandler was placed inside a
Flickable it would call sendFilteredPointerEvent() for each of the
handlers, even if they were siblings.
This is not ideal, and because of a mechanism in flickable it even caused
the DragHandler to not drag the item as expected.
This is because of a mechanism in Flickable where the value returned is
actually derived from the previous call to filterMouseEvent() (stored in
member variable stealGrab).
Below are the relevant steps it went through when the mouse drag exceeded
the drag threshold (mouse pointer started on the item):
Precondition: QQuickFlickablePrivate::stealMouse == false
1. Mouse Drag (which exceeded drag threshold)
2. sendFilteredPointerEvent(tapHandler->parentItem()) returns false.
(but since it moved beyond threshold, it would set stealGrab-> true).
3. tapHandler->handlePointerEvent() declined and ungrabbed (due to
DragThreshold gesture policy).
4. sendFilteredPointerEvent(dragHandler->parentItem()) returns true
(because the previous call to sendFilteredPointerEvent() set stealGrab
to true).
As a consequence of (4), dragHandler->handlePointerEvent() was not called,
and the flickable would start to flick instead of the item starting to drag.
Change-Id: Ia99eae91cad0903ebbaedaaafcdf92a25705a922
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is for the sake of convention. Unfortunately (and the reason
it wasn't done this way at the outset), it may prevent us from ever
having a signal called "pressed" in this handler or its base class.
Change-Id: Iafa117410e0e33562290b87df59bc8c0085c217d
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
5d4f488bf30f5650051d6cc226a75dbd17cd9a70 changed some APIs, but it forgot
to update all autotests.
Change-Id: I2a0ca14dbc1a0dddcbad597389c00d5e6f6c8b79
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: If3d9e10bb54fc75a7e72bc6367de3e083611a45f
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|
|
Flickable can steal the grab from a PointerHandler the same way it can
steal from an Item: by filtering the children's events. But within
the drag threshold, or if the DragHandler is dragging, the handlers
behave normally.
Change-Id: If1bc1f2e8d9aaebb590f3434a3018a9f1a1f1dac
Reviewed-by: Jan Arve Sæther <jan-arve.saether@qt.io>
|