aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/auto/quick/qquickmultipointtoucharea/BLACKLIST
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Extend blacklisting of qquickmultiponttoucharea to SLESTony Sarajärvi2019-04-111-0/+2
| | | | | | Task-number: QTBUG-59960 Change-Id: I6684b1a63425233dbee1d37acfe3e785cb76a597 Reviewed-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
* Blacklist tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::nonOverlapping for openSuseUlf Hermann2019-03-211-0/+2
| | | | | | | | The test is flaky, just like it is on Ubuntu. Task-number: QTBUG-74072 Change-Id: I65b1f7a00a72abd57460957a6399a86c213d082b Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
* Blacklist tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::nested on opensuseUlf Hermann2019-03-211-0/+2
| | | | | | Task-number: QTBUG-59960 Change-Id: I4a4d607c84600c83475d0ea5c10c9466d4dc626c Reviewed-by: Mitch Curtis <mitch.curtis@qt.io>
* Blacklist tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::nonOverlapping and ::nestedJoni Jantti2018-07-121-0/+2
| | | | | | | | These autotests fail on Ubuntu 18.04 builds. Task-number: QTBUG-68868 Change-Id: Ib1b094596cddc873f04fa4296a2a62b290b27ce4 Reviewed-by: Tony Sarajärvi <tony.sarajarvi@qt.io>
* Blacklist tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::nested on Ubuntu 16.04Tony Sarajärvi2017-04-061-0/+2
| | | | | | Task-number: QTBUG-59960 Change-Id: Ibbcde3aa64e517a7bc0c0073efc84ff66a3fae4c Reviewed-by: Liang Qi <liang.qi@qt.io>
* Blacklist tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::nonOverlapping in Ubuntu 16.04Tony Sarajärvi2017-04-051-0/+2
| | | | | | Task-number: QTBUG-59829 Change-Id: Ib0b416200922f1e03188960db3735e45012d2797 Reviewed-by: Liang Qi <liang.qi@qt.io>
* When stealing a touchpoint as synth. mouse, ungrab touchFrederik Gladhorn2017-03-011-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If you use MultiPointTouchArea to make a button component, or if you do something similar by subclassing QQuickItem and handling touch events, and you place such a component inside a Flickable, when the user presses on the button and then drags far enough that the Flickable steals the grab, the MPTA or custom item did not receive the touchUngrabEvent() callback. Now it does, so now the button will go back to released state as a result of having the grab stolen. The situation here is special in that it's the only place where a touch event is transformed to be treated as mouse in the future, usually it's either treated as touch or mouse from the start. When this happens, it's not enough to call setMouseGrabber because that doesn't send touch cancel to the previous grabber. Instead we need to explicitly call touchUngrabEvent to notify the touch handling item. The explicit setting of the grabber which was there previously is not needed, since grabMouse will update the grab based on touchMouseId. tst_QQuickMultiPointTouchArea::inFlickable2 was already testing the pressed state of the touchpoint when the grab is stolen, but it was changed in 468626e99a90d6ac21cb311cde05c658ccb3b781; now that can be restored, and we can also un-blacklist inFlickable, which was deemed unstable in 6d163779711d4601931ae0f82910794fb2498136 [ChangeLog][QtQuick] MultiPointTouchArea, and any custom Item, will now properly receive touchUngrabEvent() when the touch grab is stolen by a filtering parent Item, such as a Flickable. Task-number: QTBUG-57910 Change-Id: I4e1b23ed099f01e7eca2e8a0e7ab4c652ef00cfa Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@qt.io> Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
* Blacklist unstable tests for nowSimon Hausmann2015-06-051-0/+2
Change-Id: Ia29b103c33afd9aafe9ee36ee4447fab17fe00c7 Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@theqtcompany.com>