| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It seems this is causing QTBUG-62925 and QTBUG-62926 so revert
is the best option at this point to proceed
This reverts commit 4c46dce8fd9c9dddddd1d07f56396b3eabb2efc4.
Change-Id: Ia8ea85c1ac1ada1752b29c9fbd8439f5963d46d2
Reviewed-by: J-P Nurmi <jpnurmi@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Albert Astals Cid <albert.astals.cid@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederik Gladhorn <frederik.gladhorn@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes QQuickItem::isUnderMouse returning wrong information when
moving the mouse cursor with QtQuickTest::mouseX
Also changes TestCase.mouseDrag to actually resemble more what
real life does, i.e. send mouse moves with the same localPos
if the item has already moved and update tst_drag.qml accordingly
Change-Id: I80e4ab097da90d21ba987466c1b82467755a6b56
Reviewed-by: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutledge@qt.io>
|
|
2e7d4ecdc59942b484159ca827f5d5dbc8787a1b caused the regression.
To fix the regression I try accessing the signal name first
and if it is not a function try accessing the handler name.
Comes with a unit test to test both cases.
Change-Id: I3897f344df9c6219636c70259eed503d9b76f09e
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@qt.io>
|