From 002e6105f61269f1474de878ccdb26205e5b226e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@digia.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:36:01 +0200
Subject: Require a ValueScope for ScopedCallData as well

This brings things more in line with ScopedValue, and
also simplifies cleanup of Scoped values.

Change-Id: If5f1466b4e13c629d56c1e7c638937f61ba48f77
Reviewed-by: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@digia.com>
---
 src/qml/jsruntime/qv4sparsearray.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'src/qml/jsruntime/qv4sparsearray.cpp')

diff --git a/src/qml/jsruntime/qv4sparsearray.cpp b/src/qml/jsruntime/qv4sparsearray.cpp
index 4a3cf9ebce..dee0d926b4 100644
--- a/src/qml/jsruntime/qv4sparsearray.cpp
+++ b/src/qml/jsruntime/qv4sparsearray.cpp
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ bool ArrayElementLessThan::operator()(const Property &p1, const Property &p2) co
     if (Object *o = m_comparefn.asObject()) {
         ValueScope scope(o->engine());
         ScopedValue result(scope);
-        ScopedCallData callData(o->engine(), 2);
+        ScopedCallData callData(scope, 2);
         callData->thisObject = Value::undefinedValue();
         callData->args[0] = p1.value;
         callData->args[1] = p2.value;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3