| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most of the old glue code was directly injected into
the typesystem, so it was possible to add them
as snippets.
There are still a couple of header files that will remain
there, because the include tag does not have the file/snippet
tags.
A few lines of code were modified in favor of "modern" C++,
and good practices.
Task-number: PYSIDE-834
Change-Id: I3072298b16d7280550c6a7f6abae045250663ba6
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While trying to document the Limited API Project,
it suddenly struck me:
We can make the patch much much simpler and implement it
without the necessity to have an extra PepType!
Now I am happy to continue the documentation, because
it is now no more improvable.
This version will last as long as the layout of
PyTypeObject does not change substantially. When that
happens, then we need to rewrite stuff with the according
PyType_GetSlot() access functions.
These access functions will until then be complete enough
so that we can live without the tricks like inventing a reduced
PyTypeObject as was done in the current implementation.
Task-number: PYSIDE-560
Change-Id: I49849cc377baa6794a5b53292691e21d6e2853ab
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Index assignment now only accept str/bytes, bytearray, QByteArray with
size 1;
Slice assignment only accept str/bytes, bytearray, QByteArray with
limitation, that is if the step is not 1, then the number slots and
the size of the target value must be equal.
Range delete: a[2:5] = None
Shrink: value length smaller than the slot length of the slice
Expanse: value length bigger than the slot length of the slice
Range assignment with step: a[2:5:1] = ...
Range assignment with step which bigger than 1: a[2:9:2] = ...
Range assignment with native step: a[5:2:-1]
Change-Id: Ib9b929d09a691ed18c91e0c1c6b5dde827bf8d42
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Tismer <tismer@stackless.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the condensed checkin of 18 commits which created
the implementation of PEP 384.
Task-number: PYSIDE-560
Change-Id: I834c659af4c2b55b268f8e8dc4cfa53f02502409
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Removing the word 'project' from all the headers,
and changing the PySide reference from the examples
to Qt for Python:
The following line was used inside the source/ and
build_scripts/ directory:
for i in $(grep -r "the Qt for Python project" * |grep -v "pyside2-tools" | awk '{print $1}' | sed 's/:.*//g');do sed -i 's/the\ Qt\ for\ Python\ project/Qt\ for\ Python/g' $i;done
and the following line was used inside the examples/ directory:
for i in $(grep -r "of the PySide" * |grep -v "pyside2-tools" | awk '{print $1}' | sed 's/:.*//g');do sed -i 's/of\ the\ PySide/of\ the\ Qt\ for\ Python/g' $i;done
Change-Id: Ic480714686ad62ac4d81c670f87f1c2033d4ffa1
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Alex Blasche <alexander.blasche@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PySide2 for Python 3 didn't support get item by slice, e.g.
```
>>> from PySide2.QtCore import QByteArray
>>> ba = QByteArray('1234567890')
>>> ba[2:4]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: sequence index must be integer, not 'slice'
```
This is because get item by slice is supported by mp_subscript.
But current PySide2 doesn't implemented it. So I added __mgetitem__ in
QByteArray. And we also need to keep __getitem__ to support iterate over
QByteArray.
Also removed the __getslice__ from QByteArray.
Task-number: PYSIDE-567
Change-Id: I01f79cc2ab8700da92155cfad96be2e98bb8b331
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When referring to the project one should use "Qt for Python"
and for the module "PySide2"
Change-Id: I36497df245c9f6dd60d6e160e2fc805e48cefcae
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Croitor <alexandru.croitor@qt.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For short the new features:
- there is a qApp in QtCore, QtGui and QtWidgets for compatibility,
and also in __builtins__ for a true macro-like experience.
- if you delete any qApp variable, the Q*Application is reset and you can
start over.
Long description:
There is a qApp macro in Qt5 which is equivalent to Q*Application.instance() .
Python does not have macros. Both PyQt5 and PySide2 have an
according structure in QtWidgets. In the case of PySide2, the qApp
variable is first initialized to None and later to QApplication().
This does not reflect the original sense of the qApp macro, because
- it only handles QApplication,
- it does not handle destruction.
This "macro" should live in QtCore, but both PyQt5 and PySide2 decided
to put this in QtWidgets. As a compromize, I propose to put qApp into
all three modules, and into __builtins__ as well, so wherever you
create an application, you find this "macro" in place.
While changing the code, I stumbled over the template
set_qapp_parent_for_orphan. I tried to make sense out of it and finally
removed it. There were no side effects but bug PYSIDE-85 is gone, now.
With some extra effort, I created a singleton qApp that changes itself.
This way, a true macro was simulated. Note that this was not possible
with a garbage collected variable, and I had to make shiboken aware of this.
As the final optimization, I turned qApp also into a fuse variable:
Delete any qApp variable and Q*Application will finish when there is
no extra reference.
Task-number: PYSIDE-85
Task-number: PYSIDE-571
Change-Id: I7a56b19858f63349c98b95778759a6a6de856938
Reviewed-by: Christian Tismer <tismer@stackless.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Q*Application had PySequence as Parameter, although
only QStringList is accepted. That resulted in an implausible error
message when a list of, say, Integers was given.
This patch
- replaces PySequence by QStringList (one more tuple layer),
- fixes QCoreApplication to give the same kind of error messages,
- renames the shiboken function sequenceToArgcArgv to listToArgcArgv
and changes it to only allow list descendents.
We also changed signature.typing in one line to display List[str] correctly.
I think this belongs more to PySide-331, a fixed qApp.
Task-number: PYSIDE-510
Task-number: PYSIDE-331
Change-Id: Ib256c6a2db05a3db826454e1bf1b4729d59a240b
Reviewed-by: Friedemann Kleint <Friedemann.Kleint@qt.io>
|
|
|
in preparation for a subtree merge.
this should not be necessary to do in a separate commit, but git is a
tad stupid about following history correctly without it.
|
