QList: don't lose reserved capacity in op+= with empty LHS

It is very rare that operator+= is used as operator=.
Most of the time, one op+= is followed by more op+=s.

The old code checked whether *this was empty, and simply
shallow-copied the RHS into the LHS in that case. This
has one severe drawback: a reserve() on the LHS is lost.

Fix by not checking for isEmpty() but for d == &shared_null.

Change-Id: Iff28e496cf24cc93f248449d74012c4f3a87253e
Reviewed-by: Olivier Goffart (Woboq GmbH) <ogoffart@woboq.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions