Fix capacity reservation for shared QByteArray

We can squeeze, but not by discarding elements. Make sure the size of
the object stays intact after changing the reserved capacity.

I've also added unit tests for other containers, just to be sure.

Task-number: QTBUG-37750
Change-Id: I5135b095943b7589423c51cebcb52af792468e61
Reviewed-by: Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com>
Reviewed-by: Jędrzej Nowacki <jedrzej.nowacki@digia.com>

1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tests/auto/corelib/tools/qlist/tst_qlist.cpp b/tests/auto/corelib/tools/qlist/tst_qlist.cpp
index 2c9bf9d4c9..d77cc4a37c 100644
--- a/tests/auto/corelib/tools/qlist/tst_qlist.cpp
+++ b/tests/auto/corelib/tools/qlist/tst_qlist.cpp
@@ -278,6 +278,8 @@ private slots:
     void setSharableComplex() const;
     void eraseValidIteratorsOnSharedList() const;
     void insertWithValidIteratorsOnSharedList() const;
+
+    void reserve() const;
 private:
     template<typename T> void length() const;
     template<typename T> void append() const;
@@ -1669,5 +1671,31 @@ void tst_QList::insertWithValidIteratorsOnSharedList() const
     QCOMPARE(a.at(1), 15);
 }
 
+void tst_QList::reserve() const
+{
+    // Note:
+    // This test depends on QList's current behavior that ints are stored in the array itself.
+    // This test would not work for QList<Complex>.
+    int capacity = 100;
+    QList<int> list;
+    list.reserve(capacity);
+    list << 0;
+    int *data = &list[0];
+
+    for (int i = 1; i < capacity; i++) {
+        list << i;
+        QCOMPARE(&list.at(0), data);
+    }
+
+    QList<int> copy = list;
+    list.reserve(capacity / 2);
+    QCOMPARE(list.size(), capacity); // we didn't shrink the size!
+
+    copy = list;
+    list.reserve(capacity * 2);
+    QCOMPARE(list.size(), capacity);
+    QVERIFY(&list.at(0) != data);
+}
+
 QTEST_APPLESS_MAIN(tst_QList)
 #include "tst_qlist.moc"