summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/auto/widgets/widgets/qdatetimeedit/tst_qdatetimeedit.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEdward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>2022-08-03 16:24:05 +0200
committerEdward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>2022-08-04 20:39:52 +0200
commita46a426b43309c5585bcb8891dd77ac1ab92ff09 (patch)
tree929107f879455b68b0a8bf47673aac32488fec96 /tests/auto/widgets/widgets/qdatetimeedit/tst_qdatetimeedit.cpp
parentd1d43b231f4c7c5663cb49875c2e5876f352b564 (diff)
Fix handling of invalid input to Q(Date|Time)Edit constructors
Change to match how QDateTimeEdit()'s overloads taking a QDate or QTime work, substituting a default value in place of an invalid one. This fixes one surprising anomaly in a recently-extended test, so that it now only fails the way I expected. Task-number: QTBUG-105322 Change-Id: Ied4da6160b7efe70990f956798fb826b5b36d8bb Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/auto/widgets/widgets/qdatetimeedit/tst_qdatetimeedit.cpp')
-rw-r--r--tests/auto/widgets/widgets/qdatetimeedit/tst_qdatetimeedit.cpp3
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/tests/auto/widgets/widgets/qdatetimeedit/tst_qdatetimeedit.cpp b/tests/auto/widgets/widgets/qdatetimeedit/tst_qdatetimeedit.cpp
index 48955bc8a0..1328e11f03 100644
--- a/tests/auto/widgets/widgets/qdatetimeedit/tst_qdatetimeedit.cpp
+++ b/tests/auto/widgets/widgets/qdatetimeedit/tst_qdatetimeedit.cpp
@@ -506,8 +506,7 @@ void tst_QDateTimeEdit::constructor_qdate()
{
QDateEdit dte(parameter);
dte.show();
- QEXPECT_FAIL("normal", "QTBUG-105322: constructors use wrong spec", Continue);
- QEXPECT_FAIL("invalid", "Constructor neglects default replacement of invalid", Continue);
+ QEXPECT_FAIL("", "QTBUG-105322: constructors use wrong spec", Continue);
if (QByteArrayView(QTest::currentDataTag()) == "invalid")
QCOMPARE(dte.date(), QDate(2000, 1, 1));
else