summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/auto/corelib/global/qkeycombination/tst_qkeycombination.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* QKeyCombination: use new comparison helper macrosTatiana Borisova2024-04-171-40/+27
| | | | | | | | | | Replace public friend operators operator==(), operator!=() of QKeyCombination to friend method comparesEqual() and Q_DECLARE_EQUALITY_COMPARABLE_LITERAL_TYPE macro. Task-number: QTBUG-120304 Change-Id: I679f3fa5fcc4c675a763cc5a5fe0e0880439a64f Reviewed-by: Ivan Solovev <ivan.solovev@qt.io>
* Change license for tests filesLucie Gérard2024-02-041-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | According to QUIP-18 [1], all tests file should be LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR GPL-3.0-only [1]: https://contribute.qt-project.org/quips/18 Pick-to: 6.7 Task-number: QTBUG-121787 Change-Id: I9657df5d660820e56c96d511ea49d321c54682e8 Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
* Use SPDX license identifiersLucie Gérard2022-05-161-27/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Replace the current license disclaimer in files by a SPDX-License-Identifier. Files that have to be modified by hand are modified. License files are organized under LICENSES directory. Task-number: QTBUG-67283 Change-Id: Id880c92784c40f3bbde861c0d93f58151c18b9f1 Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org> Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io> Reviewed-by: Jörg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
* Long live QKeyCombination!Giuseppe D'Angelo2020-09-031-0/+317
C++20 via P1120 is deprecating arithmetic operations between unrelated enumeration types, and GCC 10 is already complaining. Hence, these operations might become illegal in C++23 or C++26 at the latest. A case of this that affects Qt is in key combinations: a QKeySequence can be constructed by summing / ORing modifiers and a key, for instance: Qt::CTRL + Qt::Key_A Qt::SHIFT | Qt::CTRL | Qt::Key_G (recommended, see below) The problem is that the modifiers and the key belong to different enumerations (and there's 2 enumerations for the modifier, and one for the key). To solve this: add a dedicated class to represent a combination of keys, and operators between those enumerations to build instances of this class. I would've simply defined operator|, but again docs and pre-existing code use operator+ as well, so added both to at least tackle simple cases (modifier + key). Multiple modifiers create a problem: operator+ between them yields int, not the corresponding flags type (because operator+ is not overloaded for this use case): Qt::CTRL + Qt::SHIFT + Qt::Key_A \__________________/ / int / \______________/ int Not only this loses track of the datatypes involved, but it would also then "add" the key (with NO warnings, now its int + enum, so it's not mixing enums!) and yielding int again. I don't want to special-case this; the point of the class is that int is the wrong datatype. Everything works just fine when using operator| instead: Qt::CTRL | Qt::SHIFT | Qt::Key_A \__________________/ / Qt::Modifiers / \______________/ QKeyCombination So I'm defining operator+ so that the simple cases still work, but also deprecating it. Port some code around Qt to the new class. In certain cases, it's a huge win for clarity. In some others, I've just added the necessary casts to make it still compile without warnings, without attempting refactorings. [ChangeLog][QtCore][QKeyCombination] New class to represent a combination of a key and zero or more modifiers, to be used when defining shortcuts or similar. [ChangeLog][Potentially Source-Incompatible Changes] A keyboard modifier (such as Qt::CTRL, Qt::AltModifier, etc.) should be combined with a key (such as Qt::Key_A, Qt::Key_F1, etc.) by using operator|, not operator+. The result is now an object of type QKeyCombination, that stores the key and the modifiers. Change-Id: I657a3a328232f059023fff69c5031ee31cc91dd6 Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>